These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27965035)

  • 1. Experimental toxicology: Issues of statistics, experimental design, and replication.
    Briner W; Kirwan J
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():137-142. PubMed ID: 27965035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations for appropriate statistical practice in toxicologic experiments.
    Muller KE; Barton CN; Benignus VA
    Neurotoxicology; 1984; 5(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 6542184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making Surveys Count: Enhancing the Rigor of Survey-Based Research in Medical Toxicology.
    Beauchamp GA; Perrone J
    J Med Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 12(4):329-331. PubMed ID: 27342463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines on statistics for researchers using laboratory animals: the essentials.
    Gosselin RD
    Lab Anim; 2019 Feb; 53(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 29954248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical considerations on the design, execution and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity studies to be published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology.
    Maurissen J
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2010; 32(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 19755149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental designs, statistics and interpretation.
    Simmons JE; Gennings C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996; 34(11-12):1169-71. PubMed ID: 9119334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American College of Toxicology: policy statement on the use of animals in toxicology.
    Int J Toxicol; 2002; 21(2):2p preceding 81. PubMed ID: 12022633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commentary.
    Breslow NE
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 20538870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducible research and the substantive context.
    Keiding N
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 20498225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Statistics" is not a sausage machine: a statistician's viewpoint and some comments on experimental design.
    Gaines Das RE
    Altern Lab Anim; 2004 Sep; 32 Suppl 2():5-8. PubMed ID: 15601219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of toxicity: statistical considerations.
    Herson J
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1980; 64(2-3):463-8. PubMed ID: 7407785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of dispersion analysis for standardizing the conditions of a toxicological experiment].
    Ershova EA; Kagan IuS; Sova RE
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1975 Jul; (7):52-4. PubMed ID: 1165041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA microarrays: vital statistics.
    Tilstone C
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):610-2. PubMed ID: 12904757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bad statistics.
    Mitchell CL
    Neurotoxicology; 1982 Nov; 3(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 6891763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IPEG guideline on statistical design and analysis for pharmacodynamic trials. International Pharmaco-EEG Group.
    Ferber G; Abt K; Fichte K; Luthringer R
    Neuropsychobiology; 1999; 39(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 10072666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical practices: the seven deadly sins.
    Millis S
    Child Neuropsychol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 13680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RMV data analysis and conclusions by AIT Working Party.
    Kuehl P
    Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 21(5):434. PubMed ID: 19496698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purpose and guidelines for toxicokinetic studies within the National Toxicology Program.
    Buchanan JR; Burka LT; Melnick RL
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 May; 105(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 9222127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How many pigs? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments.
    Aaron DK; Hays VW
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E245-54. PubMed ID: 15471805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.