These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27965191)

  • 1. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.
    Okike K; Peter-Bibb TK; Xie KC; Okike ON
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e324. PubMed ID: 27965191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Impact of Online Ratings and Report Cards on Patient Choice of Cardiac Surgeon: Large Observational Study.
    Li X; Chou SY; Deily ME; Qian M
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e28098. PubMed ID: 34709192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online Surgeon Ratings and Outcomes in Hernia Surgery: An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis.
    Haskins IN; Krpata DM; Rosen MJ; Perez AJ; Tastaldi L; Butler RS; Rosenblatt S; Prabhu AS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Nov; 225(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 28838868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.
    Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS
    HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of data and methodology of online surgeon scorecards.
    Xu LW; Li A; Swinney C; Babu M; Veeravagu A; Wolfe SQ; Nahed BV; Ratliff JK;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 27661563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Schneider EC; Epstein AM
    JAMA; 1998 May; 279(20):1638-42. PubMed ID: 9613914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
    Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study.
    Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.