These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27965405)

  • 21. Meat from cattle slaughtered without stunning sold in the conventional market without appropriate labelling: A case study in Italy.
    D'amico P; Vitelli N; Cenci Goga B; Nucera D; Pedonese F; Guidi A; Armani A
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():1-6. PubMed ID: 28738224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The United States perspective towards poultry slaughter.
    Thaler AM
    Poult Sci; 1999 Feb; 78(2):298-301. PubMed ID: 10051047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A critical review of electrical water-bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies.
    Shields SJ; Raj AB
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2010; 13(4):281-99. PubMed ID: 20865613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens, and ducks.
    Hindle VA; Lambooij E; Reimert HG; Workel LD; Gerritzen MA
    Poult Sci; 2010 Mar; 89(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 20181854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant.
    Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():52-58. PubMed ID: 28579088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Animal welfare and workers' protection during electric stunning of poultry for slaughter].
    Wormuth HJ; Schütt-Abraham I
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1989 Mar; 96(3):104-7. PubMed ID: 2651067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry-a focus on fed cattle.
    Edwards-Callaway LN; Calvo-Lorenzo MS
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32026929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Head-only electrical stunning of poultry using a waterbath: a feasibility study.
    Lines JA; Raj AB; Wotton SB; O'Callaghan M; Knowles TG
    Br Poult Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 21919570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Welfare indicators during broiler slaughtering.
    Grilli C; Loschi AR; Rea S; Stocchi R; Leoni L; Conti F
    Br Poult Sci; 2015; 56(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25567419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A study of preslaughter pig handling and stunning in selected South African Highveld Region abattoirs.
    Spencer BT; Veary CM
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2010 Jun; 81(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21247016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Broiler carcass quality using head-only electrical stunning in a waterbath.
    Lines JA; Wotton SB; Barker R; Spence J; Wilkins L; Knowles TG
    Br Poult Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 21919571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Halal Criteria Versus Conventional Slaughter Technology.
    Abdullah FAA; Borilova G; Steinhauserova I
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 31387323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Animal-Based Welfare Assessment of Cattle and Water Buffalo in Bangladeshi Slaughterhouses.
    Alam MR; Islam MJ; Amin A; Shaikat AH; Pasha MR; Doyle RE
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2020; 23(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 31145865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Head-only followed by cardiac arrest electrical stunning is an effective alternative to head-only electrical stunning in pigs.
    Vogel KD; Badtram G; Claus JR; Grandin T; Turpin S; Weyker RE; Voogd E
    J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1412-8. PubMed ID: 21183712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
    Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 20599326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter.
    Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2008 Sep; 80(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 22063164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of gas stunning and halal slaughter (no stunning) on rabbits welfare indicators and meat quality.
    Nakyinsige K; Sazili AQ; Zulkifli I; Goh YM; Abu Bakar F; Sabow AB
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):701-8. PubMed ID: 25089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Mar; 216(6):848-51. PubMed ID: 22570895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of EU electrical stunning conditions on breast meat quality of broiler chickens.
    Sirri F; Petracci M; Zampiga M; Meluzzi A
    Poult Sci; 2017 Aug; 96(8):3000-3004. PubMed ID: 28444251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.