BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2796546)

  • 1. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Boggess WJ; Baker JE; Balkany TJ
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2796546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Rigante M; Paludetti G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation.
    Hodges AV; Schloffman J; Balkany T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Mar; 18(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 9093674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed loss of residual hearing in Clarion cochlear implant users.
    Barbara M; Mattioni A; Monini S; Chiappini I; Ronchetti F; Ballantyne D; Mancini P; Filipo R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Nov; 117(11):850-3. PubMed ID: 14670143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.
    Cullen RD; Higgins C; Buss E; Clark M; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2218-23. PubMed ID: 15564849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
    Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
    Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Otosclerosis: mid-term results of cochlear implantation.
    Sainz M; García-Valdecasas J; Garófano M; Ballesteros JM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 17675831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
    Ruh S; Battmer RD; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].
    Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 8376183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.