905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27965491)
21. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
Franzon R; Opdam NJ; Guimarães LF; Demarco FF; Casagrande L; Haas AN; Araujo FB
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
Lyons K;
N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
Kharma K; Zogheib T; Bhandi S; Mehanna C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29422475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Restorative materials in the primary dentition of poli-caries patients.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17394888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 18491670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
