These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 279655)

  • 1. Undercut reproducibility of functional impression materials (tissue conditioners).
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jul; 5(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions.
    Razek MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Oct; 42(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 290790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue conditioners as functional impression materials.
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Oct; 5(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 280636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials.
    Chander S; Hill M; Moore D; Morrow L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17645067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional stability and weight changes of tissue conditioners.
    Murata H; Kawamura M; Hamada T; Saleh S; Kresnoadi U; Toki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Oct; 28(10):918-23. PubMed ID: 11737562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visco-elastic properties of four currently used tissue conditioners.
    De Mot B; De Clercq M; Rousseeuw P
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Sep; 11(5):419-27. PubMed ID: 6594483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties of tissue conditioners. Part II: creep characteristics.
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Sep; 40(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 279680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability and surface roughness of a tissue conditioner material.
    Khaledi A; Borhanihaghighi Z; Vojdani M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22124041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.