These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27965508)

  • 1. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
    Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
    Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
    Schropp L; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 24890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does cone beam computed tomography-derived bone density give predictable data about stability changes of immediately loaded implants?: A 1-year resonance frequency follow-up study.
    Tatli U; Salimov F; Kürkcü M; Akoğlan M; Kurtoğlu C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):e293-9. PubMed ID: 24799099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
    Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The outcome of oral implants placed in bone with limited bucco-oral dimensions: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Temmerman A; Keestra JA; Coucke W; Teughels W; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Mar; 42(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25682801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model.
    Pontes AE; Ribeiro FS; da Silva VC; Margonar R; Piattelli A; Cirelli JA; Marcantonio E
    J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):486-94. PubMed ID: 18315431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.
    Novaes AB; Barros RR; Muglia VA; Borges GJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 19288884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Initial Implant Stability of Implants Placed Using Bicortical Fixation, Indirect Sinus Elevation, and Unicortical Fixation.
    Hsu A; Seong WJ; Wolff R; Zhang L; Hodges J; Olin PS; Hinrichs JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 27004293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.
    Fetner M; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Clozza E; Tovar N; Sarendranath A; Coelho PG; Neiva K; Janal MN; Neiva R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 26394343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.