211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27966220)
1. Semi-automated delineation of breast cancer tumors and subsequent materialization using three-dimensional printing (rapid prototyping).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Harz M; Meier-Meitinger M; Brehm B; Wacker T; Hahn HK; Wagner F; Wittenberg T; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Fasching PA; Emons J
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):238-242. PubMed ID: 27966220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective trial of breast MRI versus 2D and 3D ultrasound for evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lee MC; Gonzalez SJ; Lin H; Zhao X; Kiluk JV; Laronga C; Mooney B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2888-94. PubMed ID: 25589151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages.
Nguyen T; Levy G; Poncelet E; Le Thanh T; Prolongeau JF; Phalippou J; Massoni F; Laurent N
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):843-59. PubMed ID: 26275829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Modeling May Improve Surgical Education and Clinical Practice.
Jones DB; Sung R; Weinberg C; Korelitz T; Andrews R
Surg Innov; 2016 Apr; 23(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26423911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasound and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in determining benign and malignant breast lesions using pathology as a gold standard, in 102 Chinese women.
Yang L; Zhou C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 30843008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI-based 3D-printed surgical guides for breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Ko BS; Kim N; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee SB; Son BH; Kim HH; Seo JB; Kim SB; Gong GY; Kim GB; Lee S; Choi SH; Ahn SH
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11991. PubMed ID: 31427647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings.
Bansal GJ; Young P
Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20140855. PubMed ID: 26133221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.
Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of Imaging and Treatment Monitoring of Breast Lesions with Three-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography.
Athanasiou A; Latorre-Ossa H; Criton A; Tardivon A; Gennisson JL; Tanter M
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 25741668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional Printing and Augmented Reality: Enhanced Precision for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.
Wake N; Bjurlin MA; Rostami P; Chandarana H; Huang WC
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():227-228. PubMed ID: 29801927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?
Alakhras M; Bourne R; Rickard M; Ng KH; Pietrzyk M; Brennan PC
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 23465326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast tomosynthesis.
Diekmann F; Bick U
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 21782118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Park J; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Choi YW; Kim HH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():261-268. PubMed ID: 30396666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerves of Steel: a Low-Cost Method for 3D Printing the Cranial Nerves.
Javan R; Davidson D; Javan A
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Oct; 30(5):576-583. PubMed ID: 28224379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
