212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27966220)
21. Use of 3D Prototypes for Complex Surgical Oncologic Cases.
Krauel L; Fenollosa F; Riaza L; Pérez M; Tarrado X; Morales A; Gomà J; Mora J
World J Surg; 2016 Apr; 40(4):889-94. PubMed ID: 26541866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomic Models Derived From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data: Current State and Image Acquisition Recommendations for Appropriate Clinical Scenarios.
Talanki VR; Peng Q; Shamir SB; Baete SH; Duong TQ; Wake N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1060-1081. PubMed ID: 34046959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility and Scope of Rapid Prototyping in Patients with Complex Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects or Double-Outlet Right Ventricle: Does it Alter Management Decisions?
Bhatla P; Tretter JT; Ludomirsky A; Argilla M; Latson LA; Chakravarti S; Barker PC; Yoo SJ; McElhinney DB; Wake N; Mosca RS
Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 27837304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Data-driven breast decompression and lesion mapping from digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wels M; Kelm BM; Hammon M; Jerebko A; Sühling M; Comaniciu D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):438-46. PubMed ID: 23285581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Imaging: How Does It Fit into Preoperative Evaluation and Surveillance?
Eghtedari M; Tsai C; Robles J; Blair SL; Ojeda-Fournier H
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2018 Jan; 27(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 29132564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomic Modeling for Surgical Planning and Real-Time Operative Guidance in Complex Primary Spinal Column Tumors: Single-Center Experience and Case Series.
Leary OP; Crozier J; Liu DD; Niu T; Pertsch NJ; Camara-Quintana JQ; Svokos KA; Syed S; Telfeian AE; Oyelese AA; Woo AS; Gokaslan ZL; Fridley JS
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jan; 145():e116-e126. PubMed ID: 33010507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The production of digital and printed resources from multiple modalities using visualization and three-dimensional printing techniques.
Shui W; Zhou M; Chen S; Pan Z; Deng Q; Yao Y; Pan H; He T; Wang X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27480284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast; An adequate replacement for MRI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumour response evaluation? - RESPONDER trial.
van Egdom LSE; Lagendijk M; Heijkoop EHM; Koning AHJ; van Deurzen CHM; Jager A; van Lankeren W; Koppert LB
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():94-100. PubMed ID: 29857873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. "Pin the Tumor on the Kidney:" An Evaluation of How Surgeons Translate CT and MRI Data to 3D Models.
Wake N; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Chandarana H; Huang WC
Urology; 2019 Sep; 131():255-261. PubMed ID: 31233814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 3D MRI-based tumor delineation of ocular melanoma and its comparison with conventional techniques.
Daftari Ik; Aghaian E; O'Brien JM; Dillon W; Phillips TL
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3355-62. PubMed ID: 16372413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.
Houssami N; Skaane P
Breast; 2013 Apr; 22(2):101-108. PubMed ID: 23422255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Johnson MM
Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
