213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27966220)
41. Development of a Patient-specific Tumor Mold Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3-Dimensional Printing Technology for Targeted Tissue Procurement and Radiomics Analysis of Renal Masses.
Dwivedi DK; Chatzinoff Y; Zhang Y; Yuan Q; Fulkerson M; Chopra R; Brugarolas J; Cadeddu JA; Kapur P; Pedrosa I
Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():209-214. PubMed ID: 29056576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Operative simulation of anterior clinoidectomy using a rapid prototyping model molded by a three-dimensional printer.
Okonogi S; Kondo K; Harada N; Masuda H; Nemoto M; Sugo N
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Sep; 159(9):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 28508160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.
Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Clinical Application and Multidisciplinary Assessment of Three Dimensional Printing in Double Outlet Right Ventricle With Remote Ventricular Septal Defect.
Garekar S; Bharati A; Chokhandre M; Mali S; Trivedi B; Changela VP; Solanki N; Gaikwad S; Agarwal V
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg; 2016 May; 7(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 27142402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three-dimensional printing to facilitate anatomic study, device development, simulation, and planning in thoracic surgery.
Kurenov SN; Ionita C; Sammons D; Demmy TL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):973-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25659851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evidence on Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three-dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer Screening.
Houssami N
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):255-260.e1. PubMed ID: 29066138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Model observer for assessing digital breast tomosynthesis for multi-lesion detection in the presence of anatomical noise.
Wen G; Markey MK; Haygood TM; Park S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045017. PubMed ID: 29376838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Checcucci E; Amparore D; Autorino R; Dasgupta P; Wiklund P; Tewari A; Liatsikos E; Fiori C;
World J Urol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 29127451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Reynolds A
Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(1):63M-82M; quiz 83M-85M. PubMed ID: 24029897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Digital breast tomosynthesis.
Baldwin P
Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):57M-74M. PubMed ID: 19738189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Indications and Clinical Applications.
Peppard HR; Nicholson BE; Rochman CM; Merchant JK; Mayo RC; Harvey JA
Radiographics; 2015; 35(4):975-90. PubMed ID: 26024062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
Freer PE; Winkler N
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Additional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Suspicious Lesions in Known Patients With Breast Cancer: Comparison of Second-Look Digital Tomosynthesis and Ultrasonography.
Koh J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Jun; 33(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 28221238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Principles of three-dimensional printing and clinical applications within the abdomen and pelvis.
Bastawrous S; Wake N; Levin D; Ripley B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Oct; 43(10):2809-2822. PubMed ID: 29619525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
