These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27966513)
1. Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An Sethi KS; Karde PA; Joshi CP Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(5):535-539. PubMed ID: 27966513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro oral biofilm formation on triclosan-coated sutures in the absence and presence of additional antiplaque treatment. Venema S; Abbas F; van de Belt-Gritter B; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; van Hoogmoed CG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):980-5. PubMed ID: 20674122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays. Rothenburger S; Spangler D; Bhende S; Burkley D Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S79-87. PubMed ID: 12573042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viable adhered Staphylococcus aureus highly reduced on novel antimicrobial sutures using chlorhexidine and octenidine to avoid surgical site infection (SSI). Obermeier A; Schneider J; Harrasser N; Tübel J; Mühlhofer H; Pförringer D; Deimling CV; Foehr P; Kiefel B; Krämer C; Stemberger A; Schieker M; Burgkart R; von Eisenhart-Rothe R PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190912. PubMed ID: 29315313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bacterial colonization on absorbable non-coated suture with Triclosan- or Chlorhexidine-coated sutures: a randomized controlled study. Chaganti S; Kunthsam V; Velangini SY; Alzahrani KJ; Alzahrani FM; Halawani IF; Alshahrani M; Ashi H; Baeshen HA; Patil S Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(18):8371-8383. PubMed ID: 37782154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of triclosan-coated suture material on bacteria commonly isolated from wounds in dogs. McCagherty J; Yool DA; Paterson GK; Mitchell SR; Woods S; Marques AI; Hall JL; Mosley JR; Nuttall TJ Am J Vet Res; 2020 Jan; 81(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 31887087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photodynamic antimicrobial effect of safranine O on an ex vivo periodontal biofilm. Voos AC; Kranz S; Tonndorf-Martini S; Voelpel A; Sigusch H; Staudte H; Albrecht V; Sigusch BW Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Mar; 46(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 24473989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Microbial Adherence on Antibacterial Suture Materials during Intraoral Wound Healing: A Prospective Comparative Study. Kandathil AM; Aslam SA; Abidha R; Cherian MP; Soman S; Sudarsanan M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Aug; 24(8):515-520. PubMed ID: 38193173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Ford HR; Jones P; Gaines B; Reblock K; Simpkins DL Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16201941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial Activity of Antibacterial Sutures in Oral Surgery: A Scoping Review. La Rosa GRM; Scapellato S; Cicciù M; Pedullà E Int Dent J; 2024 Aug; 74(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 38429145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative assessment of antibacterial properties of neem oil coated sutures: An Kaur B; Sekhar V; Sharma P; Malhotra S; Jain A J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2023; 27(5):487-491. PubMed ID: 37781326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of two antibacterial-coated resorbable sutures versus noncoated resorbable sutures in periodontal flap surgery: A clinico-microbiological study. Karde PA; Sethi KS; Mahale SA; Mamajiwala AS; Kale AM; Joshi CP J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 31143002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria. Pelz K; Tödtmann N; Otten JE Ann Agric Environ Med; 2015; 22(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 26403133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical and functional comparison of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with Coated VICRYL* Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Storch M; Scalzo H; Van Lue S; Jacinto G Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S65-77. PubMed ID: 12573041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of triclosan and DispersinB combination. Darouiche RO; Mansouri MD; Gawande PV; Madhyastha S J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jul; 64(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 19447791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Efficacy of taurine haloamines and chlorhexidine against selected oral microbiome species]. Pasich E; Bialecka A; Marcinkiewicz J Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2013; 65(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 24432558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan). Ming X; Rothenburger S; Yang D Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 8(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 17437365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan). Barbolt TA Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S45-53. PubMed ID: 12573039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]