311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27966513)
1. Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An
Sethi KS; Karde PA; Joshi CP
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(5):535-539. PubMed ID: 27966513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro oral biofilm formation on triclosan-coated sutures in the absence and presence of additional antiplaque treatment.
Venema S; Abbas F; van de Belt-Gritter B; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; van Hoogmoed CG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):980-5. PubMed ID: 20674122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays.
Rothenburger S; Spangler D; Bhende S; Burkley D
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S79-87. PubMed ID: 12573042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viable adhered Staphylococcus aureus highly reduced on novel antimicrobial sutures using chlorhexidine and octenidine to avoid surgical site infection (SSI).
Obermeier A; Schneider J; Harrasser N; Tübel J; Mühlhofer H; Pförringer D; Deimling CV; Foehr P; Kiefel B; Krämer C; Stemberger A; Schieker M; Burgkart R; von Eisenhart-Rothe R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190912. PubMed ID: 29315313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bacterial colonization on absorbable non-coated suture with Triclosan- or Chlorhexidine-coated sutures: a randomized controlled study.
Chaganti S; Kunthsam V; Velangini SY; Alzahrani KJ; Alzahrani FM; Halawani IF; Alshahrani M; Ashi H; Baeshen HA; Patil S
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(18):8371-8383. PubMed ID: 37782154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of triclosan-coated suture material on bacteria commonly isolated from wounds in dogs.
McCagherty J; Yool DA; Paterson GK; Mitchell SR; Woods S; Marques AI; Hall JL; Mosley JR; Nuttall TJ
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Jan; 81(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 31887087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photodynamic antimicrobial effect of safranine O on an ex vivo periodontal biofilm.
Voos AC; Kranz S; Tonndorf-Martini S; Voelpel A; Sigusch H; Staudte H; Albrecht V; Sigusch BW
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Mar; 46(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 24473989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Microbial Adherence on Antibacterial Suture Materials during Intraoral Wound Healing: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Kandathil AM; Aslam SA; Abidha R; Cherian MP; Soman S; Sudarsanan M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Aug; 24(8):515-520. PubMed ID: 38193173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).
Ford HR; Jones P; Gaines B; Reblock K; Simpkins DL
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16201941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative assessment of antibacterial properties of neem oil coated sutures: An
Kaur B; Sekhar V; Sharma P; Malhotra S; Jain A
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2023; 27(5):487-491. PubMed ID: 37781326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of two antibacterial-coated resorbable sutures versus noncoated resorbable sutures in periodontal flap surgery: A clinico-microbiological study.
Karde PA; Sethi KS; Mahale SA; Mamajiwala AS; Kale AM; Joshi CP
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 31143002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria.
Pelz K; Tödtmann N; Otten JE
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2015; 22(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 26403133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical and functional comparison of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with Coated VICRYL* Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).
Storch M; Scalzo H; Van Lue S; Jacinto G
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S65-77. PubMed ID: 12573041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Ravishankar PL; Vijayan V; Rao SK; Vadivelu SA; Narayanaswamy D; Teja S
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 May; 11(Suppl 2):S164-S168. PubMed ID: 31198330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of triclosan and DispersinB combination.
Darouiche RO; Mansouri MD; Gawande PV; Madhyastha S
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jul; 64(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 19447791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Efficacy of taurine haloamines and chlorhexidine against selected oral microbiome species].
Pasich E; Bialecka A; Marcinkiewicz J
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2013; 65(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 24432558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan).
Ming X; Rothenburger S; Yang D
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 8(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 17437365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan).
Barbolt TA
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S45-53. PubMed ID: 12573039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of wound infection rates after colon and rectal surgeries using triclosan-coated or bare sutures -- a multi-center, randomized clinical study].
Huszár O; Baracs J; Tóth M; Damjanovich L; Kotán R; Lázár G; Mán E; Baradnai G; Oláh A; Benedek-Tóth Z; Bogdán-Rajcs S; Zemanek P; Oláh T; Somodi K; Svébis M; Molnár T; Horváth ÖP
Magy Seb; 2012 Jun; 65(3):83-91. PubMed ID: 22717961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
