These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 279680)

  • 1. Mechanical properties of tissue conditioners. Part II: creep characteristics.
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Sep; 40(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 279680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue conditioners as functional impression materials.
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Oct; 5(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 280636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties of tissue conditioners. Part I: theoretical considerations, behavioral characteristics, and tensile properties.
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jul; 40(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 277691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visco-elastic properties of four currently used tissue conditioners.
    De Mot B; De Clercq M; Rousseeuw P
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Sep; 11(5):419-27. PubMed ID: 6594483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of soft lining materials on pressure distribution.
    Kawano F; Tada N; Nagao K; Matsumoto N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):567-75. PubMed ID: 2066898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Undercut reproducibility of functional impression materials (tissue conditioners).
    McCarthy JA; Moser JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jul; 5(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viscoelastic behavior of commercially available tissue conditioners under compression.
    Saitoh S; Sasaki K; Nezu T; Taira M
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Aug; 29(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 20668361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions.
    Razek MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Oct; 42(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 290790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials.
    Chander S; Hill M; Moore D; Morrow L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17645067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viscoelastic and dynamic properties of soft liners and tissue conditioners.
    Duran RL; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1979 Aug; 58(8):1801-7. PubMed ID: 288757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viscoelastic properties of tissue conditioners--stress relaxation test using Maxwell model analogy.
    Murata H; Shigeto N; Hamada T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 17(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 2213332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of addition-type silicone impression materials.
    Yeh CL; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1980 Sep; 101(3):482-4. PubMed ID: 6932434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Materials science study on work for the further development of Stafanat-impression materials].
    Bruhn L; Curth K; Schneider L
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1984 Mar; 25(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 6591659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of plasticizer loss on the viscoelasticity of temporary soft liners.
    Aloul RK; Shen C
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):254-62. PubMed ID: 12501139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques.
    Wiktorsson G; Feder D
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials.
    Frey G; Lu H; Powers J
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 16359477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Various mechanical properties of elastic impression materials].
    Roselino RB; Bignelli P; Fernandes Chaves PH
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeiro Preto; 1982; 19(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 6964944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.