These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2796902)
21. Reflections on the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Scholten MG W V Med J; 1988 May; 84(5):193-4. PubMed ID: 3376472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. Yolles BJ Group Pract J; 1988; 37(2):44, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10286622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: two states opt out. Kadzielski MA Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(5):41-2. PubMed ID: 10294797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: its history, provisions, applications and implications. Horner SL Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(4):455-98. PubMed ID: 2102058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation of "Health Care Quality Improvement Act" delayed; Supreme Court grants Certiorari in Patrick v. Burget. Rothschild IS Health Law Vigil; 1987 Nov; 10(23):1-3. PubMed ID: 10284536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. New benefits and burdens for physicians. Mickelsen RA Minn Med; 1987 Dec; 70(12):691-3. PubMed ID: 3696122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Fogel PD; Phillips EJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Facilities still in the dark about Quality Improvement Act. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10290380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. California's approach to the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Lang HL Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 10110715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act): CA doctors decide to opt out. Koska MT Hospitals; 1988 Jul; 62(13):56. PubMed ID: 3384420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Knowledge and competency in medicine. Nix JE J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 31(7):226-7. PubMed ID: 2196373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cruel and unusual punishment in the provision of prison medical care: challenging the deliberate indifference standard. Friedman MC Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1992 May; 45(4):921-49. PubMed ID: 16047450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. American Medical Association policy positions. Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1603861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Is peer review effective? Handler S Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: legislative intent and California action. Kadzielski MA Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(6):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10291007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]