These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2797137)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review.
    Hershey DR
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):424. PubMed ID: 2755503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The refereed journal: prestige in professional publication.
    Clayton BC; Boyle K
    Nurs Outlook; 1981 Sep; 29(9):531-4. PubMed ID: 6912449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journalistic rights, and wrongs.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 1999 Sep; 99(9):7. PubMed ID: 10489568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality filters in medical publications.
    Balasubramanian S; Bhaskar PA
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 82(11):420-1. PubMed ID: 6399064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
    Manschot WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
    Barzilai M
    Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who referees the referees?
    Isbister WH
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Misunderstanding of disciplinary decisions].
    Crul BV
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(40):2215. PubMed ID: 9864487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fair-use policies aim to balance access and cost of publishing.
    Dylla HF
    Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7247):641. PubMed ID: 19494896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.