364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27973967)
1. 10-Year patient satisfaction compared between computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty.
Khuangsirikul S; Lekkreusuwan K; Chotanaphuti T
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):172-175. PubMed ID: 27973967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of early clinical outcome in computer assisted surgery and conventional technique in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Chaiyakit P; Hongku N; Meknavin S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S91-6. PubMed ID: 20120669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Seon JK; Song EK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 17538792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Hasegawa M; Miyazaki S; Yamaguchi T; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 27503697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial.
Lüring C; Beckmann J; Haiböck P; Perlick L; Grifka J; Tingart M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Oct; 16(10):928-34. PubMed ID: 18633597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Conventional Instrumentation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alcelik IA; Blomfield MI; Diana G; Gibbon AJ; Carrington N; Burr S
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 26507525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Kanjanapiboonwong A; Junsee D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():37. PubMed ID: 24161011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Surgical technique.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():116-30. PubMed ID: 19255204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].
Hart R; Janecek M; Cizmár I; Stipcák V; Kucera B; Filan P
Orthopade; 2006 May; 35(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 16552520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].
Lüring C; Tingart M; Beckmann J; Perlick L; Grifka J
Orthopade; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1143-8. PubMed ID: 17972062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
