These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27974045)
1. Cumulative subgroup analysis to reduce waste in clinical research for individualised medicine. Song F; Bachmann MO BMC Med; 2016 Dec; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 27974045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: the EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis. Taylor RS; Walker S; Ciani O; Warren F; Smart NA; Piepoli M; Davos CH Health Technol Assess; 2019 May; 23(25):1-98. PubMed ID: 31140973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A recursive partitioning approach for subgroup identification in individual patient data meta-analysis. Mistry D; Stallard N; Underwood M Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29383818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study. Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses. Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning. Riley RD; Debray TPA; Fisher D; Hattle M; Marlin N; Hoogland J; Gueyffier F; Staessen JA; Wang J; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB; Ensor J Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2115-2137. PubMed ID: 32350891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome? Bordewijk EM; Wang R; van Wely M; Costello MF; Norman RJ; Teede H; Gurrin LC; Mol BW; Li W Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Nov; 26(6):929-941. PubMed ID: 32935841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the statistical performance of different meta-analysis models for the synthesis of subgroup effects from randomized clinical trials. da Costa BR; Sutton AJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):198. PubMed ID: 31655550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updating insights into rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk through shared data: individual patient and summary level meta-analyses. Wallach JD; Wang K; Zhang AD; Cheng D; Grossetta Nardini HK; Lin H; Bracken MB; Desai M; Krumholz HM; Ross JS BMJ; 2020 Feb; 368():l7078. PubMed ID: 32024657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study. Liu P; Ioannidis JPA; Ross JS; Dhruva SS; Luxkaranayagam AT; Vasiliou V; Wallach JD BMC Med; 2019 Oct; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 31639007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trials number, funding support, and intervention type associated with IPDMA data retrieval: a cross-sectional study. Wu IXY; Xiao F; Wang H; Chen Y; Zhang Z; Lin Y; Tam W J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():59-68. PubMed ID: 33098991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective meta-analysis using individual patient data in intensive care medicine. Reade MC; Delaney A; Bailey MJ; Harrison DA; Yealy DM; Jones PG; Rowan KM; Bellomo R; Angus DC Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jan; 36(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 19760395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study. Tsujimoto Y; Fujii T; Onishi A; Omae K; Luo Y; Imai H; Takahashi S; Itaya T; Pinson C; Nevitt SJ; Furukawa TA J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():107-114.e5. PubMed ID: 31654789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis. Tierney JF; Pignon JP; Gueffyier F; Clarke M; Askie L; Vale CL; Burdett S; J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1325-35. PubMed ID: 26186982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials. Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis. Sbidian E; Chaimani A; Garcia-Doval I; Do G; Hua C; Mazaud C; Droitcourt C; Hughes C; Ingram JR; Naldi L; Chosidow O; Le Cleach L Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD011535. PubMed ID: 29271481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]