These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2797504)

  • 1. When your manuscript is rejected.
    Gay JT; Edgil AE
    Nurs Health Care; 1989 Oct; 10(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 2797504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dealing with conflicting reviewers' comments.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 1996; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 8868722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals.
    Whitman N; Eyre S
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3843082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disseminating nursing knowledge--a guide to writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res; 2005 May; 10(3):1147-55. PubMed ID: 15960243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to cope with manuscript rejection.
    Peregrin T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Feb; 107(2):190, 192-3. PubMed ID: 17258951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How to write a scientific article: how to get your research published].
    Elizondo-Rivera RL; Bosques-Padilla FJ
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2007; 72(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 17966370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nurse author's guide to publishing house editors.
    Masse S
    Nurse Author Ed; 1993; 3(3):3-4, 7. PubMed ID: 8220619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publishing opportunities for nurses in Canada.
    Norris RP; O'Neill GP
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1989; 2(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2486671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reviewing manuscripts: developing an efficient system.
    Brooks-Brunn JA
    Nurse Author Ed; 1993; 3(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 8220621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
    Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S
    Natl Med J India; 1999; 12(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 10613000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals.
    Weller AC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Jul; 84(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 8883984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.