272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27975145)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in predicting progression of enhancing lesions persisting after standard treatment in glioblastoma patients: a prospective study.
Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Choi HJ; You SH; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3156-3166. PubMed ID: 27975145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognosis prediction of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity lesions in glioblastoma patients after standard treatment: application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim R; Choi SH; Yun TJ; Lee ST; Park CK; Kim TM; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 27357131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Prediction Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters from Non-Enhancing, T2-High-Signal-Intensity Lesions in Patients with Glioblastoma.
Jo SW; Choi SH; Lee EJ; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1369-1378. PubMed ID: 33987994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognosis prediction of measurable enhancing lesion after completion of standard concomitant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma patients: application of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Kim JH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113587. PubMed ID: 25419975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of Response to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide in Glioblastoma: Application of Immediate Post-Operative Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.
Lee EK; Choi SH; Yun TJ; Kang KM; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Park SH; Kim IH
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(6):1341-8. PubMed ID: 26576125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glioblastoma treated with concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy: differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Yun TJ; Park CK; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH; Choi SH
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):830-40. PubMed ID: 25333475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Nonenhancing T2 High-Signal-Intensity Lesions in Baseline and Posttreatment Glioblastoma: Temporal Change and Prognostic Value.
Hwang I; Choi SH; Park CK; Kim TM; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Jan; 41(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 31806595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Pharmacokinetic Variables in Glioblastoma Patients: Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Lesions and Non-Enhancing T2 High-Signal Intensity Lesions.
Kang Y; Hong EK; Rhim JH; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SW; Choi SH
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):707-716. PubMed ID: 32410409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of survival and progression in glioblastoma patients using temporal perfusion changes during radiochemotherapy.
Larsson C; Groote I; Vardal J; Kleppestø M; Odland A; Brandal P; Due-Tønnessen P; Holme SS; Hope TR; Meling TR; Fosse E; Emblem KE; Bjørnerud A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():106-112. PubMed ID: 32004711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR Imaging Analysis of Non-Measurable Enhancing Lesions Newly Appearing after Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients for Prognosis Prediction.
Kim BR; Choi SH; Yun TJ; Lee ST; Park CK; Kim TM; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166096. PubMed ID: 27835666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma.
Lu S; Wang S; Gao Q; Zhou M; Li Y; Cao P; Hong X; Shi H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 28806317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer.
Kuchcinski G; Le Rhun E; Cortot AB; Drumez E; Duhal R; Lalisse M; Dumont J; Lopes R; Pruvo JP; Leclerc X; Delmaire C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3733-3743. PubMed ID: 28210799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide: comparison study of standard and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chu HH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yoon TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 23771912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.
Nam JG; Kang KM; Choi SH; Lim WH; Yoo RE; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Sohn CH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Dec; 38(12):2243-2250. PubMed ID: 29074633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between perfusion computed tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing glioblastoma microvasculature.
Jia ZZ; Shi W; Shi JL; Shen DD; Gu HM; Zhou XJ
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():120-124. PubMed ID: 28034567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent Poor Prognostic Factors for True Progression after Radiation Therapy and Concomitant Temozolomide in Patients with Glioblastoma: Subependymal Enhancement and Low ADC Value.
Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Park SH; Kim IH; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1846-52. PubMed ID: 26294653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Progression-Free-Survival in Glioblastomas by Intratreatment Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
Bisdas S; Smrdel U; Bajrovic FF; Surlan-Popovic K
Clin Neuroradiol; 2016 Mar; 26(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 25164691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
