BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2797714)

  • 1. Neural and psychophysical correlates of induced interocular transmission disparities.
    Spafford MM; Cotnam MP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 66(9):600-11. PubMed ID: 2797714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interocular interaction of contrast and luminance signals in human primary visual cortex.
    Chadnova E; Reynaud A; Clavagnier S; Baker DH; Baillet S; Hess RF
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():23-30. PubMed ID: 29122719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity.
    Heravian JS; Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jul; 10(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular vision adaptively suppresses delayed monocular signals.
    Richard B; Chadnova E; Baker DH
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():753-765. PubMed ID: 29454106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular contribution to the peak time of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential.
    McKerral M; Lachapelle P; Tremblay F; Polomeno RC; Roy MS; Beneish R; Leporé F
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 8813497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75987. PubMed ID: 24155881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular summation improves performance to defocus-induced blur.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Atchison DA; Tsilimbaris MK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2784-9. PubMed ID: 21228386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular interaction with neutral density filters as measured by the visual evoked response.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Oct; 68(10):801-6. PubMed ID: 1749601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of experimental scotoma size and shape on the binocular and monocular pattern visual evoked potential.
    Geer I; Spafford MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 7813381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binocular inhibition: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pardhan S; Gilchrist J; Douthwaite W; Yap M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Sep; 67(9):688-91. PubMed ID: 2234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced Monocular Luminance Increases Monocular Temporal Synchrony Threshold in Human Adults.
    Gong L; Min SH; Chen S; Wei J; Kong D; Tao C; Zhang P; Huang PC; Zhou J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Jul; 61(8):1. PubMed ID: 32609295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of binocular disparity on binocular luminance combination.
    Maehara G; Wang Y; Murakami I
    J Vis; 2024 Feb; 24(2):4. PubMed ID: 38376853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of induced fixation disparity by negative lenses on the visually evoked potential wave.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Jul; 13(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 8265171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.
    Schneck ME; Haegerstöm-Portnoy G; Lott LA; Brabyn JA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 87(8):526-31. PubMed ID: 20526225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of interocular differences in retinal illuminance on vision and binocularity.
    Chang YH; Lee JB; Kim NS; Lee DW; Chang JH; Han SH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Sep; 244(9):1083-8. PubMed ID: 16411108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age and binocular advantage: A VEP assessment.
    Sutija VG; Ficarra AP; Paley RT; Zhang H; Solan HA; Wurst SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 2336249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interocular differences in visual latency induced by reduced-aperture monovision.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 23278194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.
    Dotto PF; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Rocha DM; Salomão SR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 28560498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.