These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27977484)

  • 21. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
    Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age verification using random forests on facial 3D landmarks.
    Jandová M; Daňko M; Urbanová P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110612. PubMed ID: 33285472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
    Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane : Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system.
    Hofmann E; Fimmers R; Schmid M; Hirschfelder U; Detterbeck A; Hertrich K
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 27502792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar cephalograms.
    Wu MC; Cheng KS; Chen YT; Liu JK; Ting WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 20660132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
    Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Facial asymmetry quantitative evaluation in oculoauriculovertebral spectrum.
    Manara R; Schifano G; Brotto D; Mardari R; Ghiselli S; Gerunda A; Ghirotto C; Fusetti S; Piacentile K; Scienza R; Ermani M; Martini A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 26578120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
    Huang CS; Liu XQ; Chen YR
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 23324075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "Direct DICOM Slice Landmarking" A Novel Research Technique to Quantify Skeletal Changes in Orthognathic Surgery.
    Almukhtar A; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Ju X; Al-Hiyali A; Macdonald J; Jabar N; Goto T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0131540. PubMed ID: 26252768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.
    Budge MD; Lewis GS; Schaefer E; Coquia S; Flemming DJ; Armstrong AD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 21324716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Novel Method to Locate Intracranial Anatomic Landmarks of Sella Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction Images for Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery.
    Wu P; Zeng H; Tan X; Ouyang J; Zhong S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2184-6. PubMed ID: 26468808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Advances in determination of median sagittal plane of facial soft tissue].
    Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao YJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):495-499. PubMed ID: 29996372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data.
    Williams FL; Richtsmeier JT
    Clin Anat; 2003 Nov; 16(6):494-500. PubMed ID: 14566895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans.
    Gwilliam JR; Cunningham SJ; Hutton T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):408-15. PubMed ID: 16901962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.