BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27978603)

  • 1. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results.
    Benic GI; Bernasconi M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Mar; 44(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 27978603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
    Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results.
    Benić GI; Jung RE; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 19302239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Jung RE; Sanz-Martin I; Unger S; Cantalapiedra A; Hämmerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):e262-e270. PubMed ID: 28378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.
    Bazrafshan N; Darby I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 23647237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Muñoz F; Sanz Martin I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 26073212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 10-year evaluation of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective cohort study.
    Covani U; Chiappe G; Bosco M; Orlando B; Quaranta A; Barone A
    J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1226-34. PubMed ID: 22220768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
    Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guided bone regeneration at zirconia and titanium dental implants: a pilot histological investigation.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Sanz-Martin I; Munoz F; Hämmerle CHF; Cantalapiedra A; Fischer J; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 28653343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Waller T; Herzog M; Thoma DS; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 32011015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
    Schropp L; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 24890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
    Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Jonker BP; Wolvius EB; van der Tas JT; Tahmaseb A; Pijpe J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):406-414. PubMed ID: 32142578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Buccal bone thickness adjacent to virtual dental implants following guided bone regeneration.
    Phillips DJ; Swenson DT; Johnson TM
    J Periodontol; 2019 Jun; 90(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 30578550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guided bone regeneration for peri-implant augmentation: A retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 26 months.
    Liu Y; Lan D; Gao J; Deng C; Man Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):573-584. PubMed ID: 38467593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Benic GI; Eisner BM; Jung RE; Basler T; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1016-1026. PubMed ID: 31332835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.
    Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 11432655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.