These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27978603)

  • 21. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration using particulate xenogenic bone substitutes with or without autogenous block grafts: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mendoza-Azpur G; de la Fuente A; Chavez E; Valdivia E; Khouly I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 30884111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L- and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes: A clinical and radiographic study.
    Jung EH; Jeong SN; Lee JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Nov; 32(11):1308-1317. PubMed ID: 34423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Brügger LV; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 34543460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation.
    Cosyn J; Eghbali A; Hanselaer L; De Rouck T; Wyn I; Sabzevar MM; Cleymaet R; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):517-30. PubMed ID: 22236111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The L-shape technique in guided bone regeneration with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: A step-by-step protocol and a 2-14 year retrospective study.
    Zuercher AN; Mancini L; Naenni N; Thoma DS; Strauss FJ; Jung RE
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 36165402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial.
    Siciliano VI; Salvi GE; Matarasso S; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19281503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of soft tissue grafting, orofacial implant position, and angulation on facial hard and soft tissue thickness at immediately inserted and provisionalized implants in the anterior maxilla.
    Noelken R; Geier J; Kunkel M; Jepsen S; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 30092115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
    Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Stability of Augmented Bone Between Two Different Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous with Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.
    Arunjaroensuk S; Panmekiate S; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):206–216. PubMed ID: 29028848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs.
    Fienitz T; Schwarz F; Ritter L; Dreiseidler T; Becker J; Rothamel D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):882-7. PubMed ID: 21707753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Cafiero C; Annibali S; Gherlone E; Grassi FR; Gualini F; Magliano A; Romeo E; Tonelli P; Lang NP; Salvi GE;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 18416726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bone regeneration using titanium plate stabilization for the treatment of peri-implant bone defects: A retrospective radiologic pilot study.
    Duan DH; Wang HL; Xiao WC; Liu Z; Wang EB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 36181244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination.
    Mir-Mari J; Wui H; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 25856209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study.
    Benic GI; Mokti M; Chen CJ; Weber HP; Hämmerle CH; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 22093013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 4- to 5-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study of Neoss implants placed with or without GBR procedures.
    Zumstein T; Billström C; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20491824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.
    Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Yaman D; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17956571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized-controlled clinical trial evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years of dental implants placed in bone regenerated by means of GBR techniques with or without the addition of BMP-2.
    Jung RE; Windisch SI; Eggenschwiler AM; Thoma DS; Weber FE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):660-6. PubMed ID: 19489935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The outcome of oral implants placed in bone with limited bucco-oral dimensions: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Temmerman A; Keestra JA; Coucke W; Teughels W; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Mar; 42(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25682801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of acemannan in implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the aesthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Deesricharoenkiat N; Jansisyanont P; Chuenchompoonut V; Mattheos N; Thunyakitpisal P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 51(4):535-544. PubMed ID: 34429224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.