These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27978603)
41. Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study. Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Buser D; von Arx T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 27476677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical and 3-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of Autogenous Iliac Block Bone Grafting and Guided Bone Regeneration in Patients With Atrophic Maxilla. Gultekin BA; Cansiz E; Borahan MO J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 75(4):709-722. PubMed ID: 27998736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hard tissue volume stability of guided bone regeneration during the healing stage in the anterior maxilla: A clinical and radiographic study. Jiang X; Zhang Y; Di P; Lin Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 29283207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A Retrospective Evaluation of 192 Implants Placed in Augmented Bone: Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Beretta M; Cicciù M; Poli PP; Rancitelli D; Bassi G; Grossi GB; Maiorana C J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 25686360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of hard tissue 3-dimensional stability around single implants placed with guided bone regeneration in the anterior maxilla: A 3-year retrospective study. Chen H; Gu T; Lai H; Gu X J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):919-927. PubMed ID: 33795161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone. Sbordone C; Toti P; Ramaglia L; Guidetti F; Sbordone L; Martuscelli R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1056-64. PubMed ID: 23822163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish convexity at the buccal aspect of single implants: A one-year CBCT analysis. De Bruyckere T; Eeckhout C; Eghbali A; Younes F; Vandekerckhove P; Cleymaet R; Cosyn J J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Nov; 45(11):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 30133718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth. Cosyn J; De Rouck T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19519788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect implants in 6 patients. Nowzari H; Chee W; Yi K; Pak M; Chung WH; Rich S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16681488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simultaneous implant placement and bone grafting with particulate mineralized allograft in sites with buccal wall defects, a three-year follow-up and review of literature. Le BT; Borzabadi-Farahani A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 24529349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical and radiographic characteristics of single-tooth replacements preceded by local ridge augmentation: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Meijndert L; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1295-303. PubMed ID: 19040446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge preserved sites: a 12-month post-loading follow-up. Patel K; Mardas N; Donos N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 22672611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Long-term Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Level after Reconstruction of Severely Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla via Vertical and Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration in Combination with Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series with 1 to 15 Years of Loading. Urban IA; Monje A; Lozada JL; Wang HL Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 27238406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: an experimental in vivo investigation. Di Raimondo R; Sanz-Esporrín J; Sanz-Martin I; Plá R; Luengo F; Vignoletti F; Nuñez J; Sanz M Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2213-2227. PubMed ID: 32851532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical radiological and aesthetic outcome after 5 years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology. Jung RE; Zaugg B; Philipp AO; Truninger TC; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):839-46. PubMed ID: 22672584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of wound closure on the volume stability of particulate and non-particulate GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. Part II. Mir-Mari J; Benic GI; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):631-639. PubMed ID: 27060694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical study of guided bone regeneration with resorbable polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane. Kawasaki T; Ohba S; Nakatani Y; Asahina I Odontology; 2018 Jul; 106(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 29429055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study. Cricchio G; Sennerby L; Lundgren S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1200-1212. PubMed ID: 21906186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters. Fu JH; Oh TJ; Benavides E; Rudek I; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 23594026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]