These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27979031)

  • 1. Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rimac G; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Ikeno F; Matsuo H; Piroth Z; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF
    Am Heart J; 2017 Jan; 183():1-9. PubMed ID: 27979031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes.
    Agarwal SK; Kasula S; Hacioglu Y; Ahmed Z; Uretsky BF; Hakeem A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(10):1022-31. PubMed ID: 27198682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study.
    Wijns W; Shite J; Jones MR; Lee SW; Price MJ; Fabbiocchi F; Barbato E; Akasaka T; Bezerra H; Holmes D
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3346-55. PubMed ID: 26242713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes.
    Kasula S; Agarwal SK; Hacioglu Y; Pothineni NK; Bhatti S; Ahmed Z; Uretsky B; Hakeem A
    Heart; 2016 Dec; 102(24):1988-1994. PubMed ID: 27492942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
    Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between OCT-derived intrastent dimensions and fractional flow reserve measurements after coronary stent implantation and impact on clinical outcome.
    Reith S; Battermann S; Hellmich M; Marx N; Burgmaier M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 May; 27(5):222-8. PubMed ID: 25929298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.
    Hanyu Y; Hoshino M; Usui E; Sugiyama T; Kanaji Y; Hada M; Nagamine T; Nogami K; Ueno H; Sakamoto T; Yonetsu T; Sasano T; Kakuta T
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2024 Apr; 37(4):428-438. PubMed ID: 38122836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Value of Pre- and Post-Stenting Fractional Flow Reserve for Predicting Mid-Term Stent Restenosis Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).
    Rai A; Bahremand M; Saidi MR; Jalili Z; Salehi N; Assareh M; Abarghoei GA; Kazerani H
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Dec; 8(7):240-44. PubMed ID: 26925913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement on Procedural Management and Clinical Outcomes: The REPEAT-FFR Study.
    Azzalini L; Poletti E; Demir OM; Ancona MB; Mangieri A; Giannini F; Carlino M; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Latib A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):229-234. PubMed ID: 31199348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.
    Li J; Elrashidi MY; Flammer AJ; Lennon RJ; Bell MR; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Rihal CS; Lerman LO; Lerman A
    Eur Heart J; 2013 May; 34(18):1375-83. PubMed ID: 23344979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic Implications of Relative Increase and Final Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation.
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Choi KH; Rhee TM; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Hwang JW; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim SH; Song YB; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hahn JY; Shin ES; Kawase Y; Matsuo A; Tanaka N; Doh JH; Koo BK; Matsuo H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2099-2109. PubMed ID: 30336814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic role of multiple biomarkers in stable patients undergoing fractional flow reserve-guided coronary angioplasty.
    Fracassi F; Niccoli G; Scalone G; Di Gioia G; Conte M; Bartunek J; Sgueglia GA; De Bruyne B; Montone RA; Wijns W; Crea F; Barbato E
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2016 Sep; 17(9):687-93. PubMed ID: 26627500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preprocedural fractional flow reserve and microvascular resistance predict increased hyperaemic coronary flow after elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Murai T; Kanaji Y; Yonetsu T; Lee T; Matsuda J; Usui E; Araki M; Niida T; Isobe M; Kakuta T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):233-242. PubMed ID: 27219714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of deferral versus performance of coronary intervention based on coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Nascimento BR; Belfort AF; Macedo FA; Sant'Anna FM; Pereira GT; Costa MA; Ribeiro AL
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 115(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 25482682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
    Kobayashi Y; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yang HM; Lim HS; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():206-10. PubMed ID: 26670174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualization of the improvement of myocardial perfusion after coronary intervention using motorized fractional flow reserve pullback curve.
    Matsuo A; Shimoo S; Takamatsu K; Tsuji Y; Kyodo A; Mera K; Koide M; Isodono K; Tsubakimoto Y; Sakatani T; Inoue K; Fujita H
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Apr; 33(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 27943219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.