508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27979700)
1. Phenol-degrading anode biofilm with high coulombic efficiency in graphite electrodes microbial fuel cell.
Zhang D; Li Z; Zhang C; Zhou X; Xiao Z; Awata T; Katayama A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Mar; 123(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 27979700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous power generation and microbial community structure of the anode biofilms in a three-stage microbial fuel cell system.
Chung K; Okabe S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 83(5):965-77. PubMed ID: 19404637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of Electroactive and Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing (Anammox) Biofilms from Digestate in Microbial Fuel Cells.
Di Domenico EG; Petroni G; Mancini D; Geri A; Di Palma L; Ascenzioni F
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():351014. PubMed ID: 26273609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output.
Picot M; Lapinsonnière L; Rothballer M; Barrière F
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 21803564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Micro-oxygen bioanode: An efficient strategy for enhancement of phenol degradation and current generation in mix-cultured MFCs.
Yang LH; Zhu TT; Cai WW; Haider MR; Wang HC; Cheng HY; Wang AJ
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Nov; 268():176-182. PubMed ID: 30077174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbially reduced graphene oxide shows efficient electricity ecovery from artificial dialysis wastewater.
Goto Y; Yoshida N
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 63(3):165-171. PubMed ID: 28484115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
Ishii S; Watanabe K; Yabuki S; Logan BE; Sekiguchi Y
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 74(23):7348-55. PubMed ID: 18836002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved fuel cell and electrode designs for producing electricity from microbial degradation.
Park DH; Zeikus JG
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Feb; 81(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 12474258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response of the microbial community structure of biofilms to ferric iron in microbial fuel cells.
Liu Q; Yang Y; Mei X; Liu B; Chen C; Xing D
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 631-632():695-701. PubMed ID: 29539598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbial diversity and population dynamics of activated sludge microbial communities participating in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells.
Ki D; Park J; Lee J; Yoo K
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2195-201. PubMed ID: 19092196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors.
Jung S; Regan JM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 17786426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-course correlation of biofilm properties and electrochemical performance in single-chamber microbial fuel cells.
Ren Z; Ramasamy RP; Cloud-Owen SR; Yan H; Mench MM; Regan JM
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):416-21. PubMed ID: 20591659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacterial communities adapted to higher external resistance can reduce the onset potential of anode in microbial fuel cells.
Suzuki K; Kato Y; Yui A; Yamamoto S; Ando S; Rubaba O; Tashiro Y; Futamata H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 May; 125(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 29373307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of inoculum and anode surface properties on the selection of Geobacter-dominated biofilms.
Commault AS; Barrière F; Lapinsonnière L; Lear G; Bouvier S; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():265-72. PubMed ID: 26166461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.
Nevin KP; Richter H; Covalla SF; Johnson JP; Woodard TL; Orloff AL; Jia H; Zhang M; Lovley DR
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 10(10):2505-14. PubMed ID: 18564184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harvesting electricity with Geobacter bremensis isolated from compost.
Nercessian O; Parot S; Délia ML; Bergel A; Achouak W
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e34216. PubMed ID: 22470538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial community composition and electricity generation in cattle manure slurry treatment using microbial fuel cells: effects of inoculum addition.
Xie B; Gong W; Ding A; Yu H; Qu F; Tang X; Yan Z; Li G; Liang H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(29):23226-23235. PubMed ID: 28831702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of formation of biofilms and chemical scale on the cathode electrode on the performance of a continuous two-chamber microbial fuel cell.
Chung K; Fujiki I; Okabe S
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):355-60. PubMed ID: 20923722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduced graphene oxide and biofilms as cathode catalysts to enhance energy and metal recovery in microbial fuel cell.
Wu Y; Wang L; Jin M; Kong F; Qi H; Nan J
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jul; 283():129-137. PubMed ID: 30901585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
