These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27979996)

  • 1. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations.
    Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the origin of soil evidence: High throughput eukaryote sequencing and MIR spectroscopy applied to a crime scene scenario.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Breen J; Macdonald LM; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():22-31. PubMed ID: 25839677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-throughput Sequencing of Trace Quantities of Soil Provides Reproducible and Discriminative Fungal DNA Profiles.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):478-484. PubMed ID: 27404621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():176-84. PubMed ID: 25151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: a review.
    Young JM; Rawlence NJ; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 24796953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single Fragment or Bulk Soil DNA Metabarcoding: Which is Better for Characterizing Biological Taxa Found in Surface Soils for Sample Separation?
    Boggs LM; Scheible MKR; Machado G; Meiklejohn KA
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 31174412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial soil community analyses for forensic science: Application to a blind test.
    Demanèche S; Schauser L; Dawson L; Franqueville L; Simonet P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():153-158. PubMed ID: 27984802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The environmental biological signature: NGS profiling for forensic comparison of soils.
    Giampaoli S; Berti A; Di Maggio RM; Pilli E; Valentini A; Valeriani F; Gianfranceschi G; Barni F; Ripani L; Romano Spica V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():41-7. PubMed ID: 24807707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology.
    Bell KL; Burgess KS; Okamoto KC; Aranda R; Brosi BJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():110-6. PubMed ID: 26751251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Future of Environmental DNA in Forensic Science.
    Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 86(2):. PubMed ID: 31704676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soil characterisation by bacterial community analysis for forensic applications: A quantitative comparison of environmental technologies.
    Habtom H; Demanèche S; Dawson L; Azulay C; Matan O; Robe P; Gafny R; Simonet P; Jurkevitch E; Pasternak Z
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():21-29. PubMed ID: 27750077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Not all are free-living: high-throughput DNA metabarcoding reveals a diverse community of protists parasitizing soil metazoa.
    Geisen S; Laros I; Vizcaíno A; Bonkowski M; de Groot GA
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Sep; 24(17):4556-69. PubMed ID: 25966360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The discrimination of geoforensic trace material from close proximity locations by organic profiling using HPLC and plant wax marker analysis by GC.
    McCulloch G; Dawson LA; Ross JM; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():310-326. PubMed ID: 29778501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of standardized bioinformatics for the analysis of fungal DNA signatures applied to sample provenance.
    Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR; Breen M; Reich BJ; Laber EB; Clifton J; Grantham NS; Faith SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110250. PubMed ID: 32240935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of a criminal suspect using environmental plant DNA metabarcoding technology.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Dong W; Yang X; Zhou S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110828. PubMed ID: 34000616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular Identification of Soil Eukaryotes and Focused Approaches Targeting Protist and Faunal Groups Using High-Throughput Metabarcoding.
    Arjen de Groot G; Laros I; Geisen S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():125-40. PubMed ID: 26791500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A semi-automated protocol for NGS metabarcoding and fungal analysis in forensic.
    Giampaoli S; De Vittori E; Frajese GV; Paytuví A; Sanseverino W; Anselmo A; Barni F; Berti A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110052. PubMed ID: 31778923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition.
    Macdonald LM; Singh BK; Thomas N; Brewer MJ; Campbell CD; Dawson LA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):813-21. PubMed ID: 18429978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Looking for Rhizobacterial Ecological Indicators in Agricultural Soils Using 16S rRNA metagenomic Amplicon Data.
    Valverde JR; Gullón S; Pérez Mellado R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165204. PubMed ID: 27780257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.