These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2798075)
1. [Comparison of intravenous drip infusion excretory urography using ionic and non-ionic contrast media]. Onitsuka H; Araki A; Torii Y; Tsukuda M; Murakami J; Ino A; Hashiguchi N; Masuda K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 49(7):915-20. PubMed ID: 2798075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Excretory urography with non-ionic contrast medium; clinical reassessment of the necessity of water deprivation]. Soga T; Maeda M; Mitsumori M; Kusui T; Hayakawa K Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Feb; 34(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 2754819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration]. Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A study of iopamidol (Iopamiron 370) in intravenous urography in the patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media and history of allergy]. Kondo K; Kamidono S; Hamami G Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Oct; 34(10):1845-51. PubMed ID: 3245531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 2. Changes in visualization by DIP]. Ikeuchi T; Hamashima T; Sakamoto M Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 2343807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)]. Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium]. Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison]. Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol]. Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography]. Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metrizamide in experimental urography. IV. Effects of bilateral ureteric stasis on urine iodine concentration after intravenous infection of an ionic and a non-ionic contrast medium. Golman K; Scient C; Almén T; Förste H Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 1262184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of iopamidol 150 and 370 with the same iodine dosage (37 g) in urography]. Crespi-Porro R; Conti A; Cabella R Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 1767056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media. Nauert C; Mützel W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media]. Porst H; Mayer R Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of lopamidol and diatrizoate in excretory urography: a double-blind clinical study. Cochran ST; Ballard JW; Katzberg RW; Barbaric ZL; Spataro R; Iwamoto K; Lee JJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 3044040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Stacul F; Cova M; Assante M; Hougens Grynne B; Haider T Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):918-22. PubMed ID: 10195004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preliminary clinical studies with a new non-ionic contrast medium (Iopamidol) in intravenous pyelography]. Miyakawa M; Yoshida O Hinyokika Kiyo; 1984 Mar; 30(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 6380240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality. Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical studies with a new non-ionic contrast medium (iopamidol) in intravenous pyelography in aged patients]. Miyakawa M; Nishio Y; Nonomura M; Matsuda T; Ueda M; Kaku S; Okamoto Y; Shitiri Y; Shirahase T; Nakamura K Hinyokika Kiyo; 1987 Mar; 33(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 2441581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iopamidol as contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: a prospective randomised comparison with diatrizoate. O'Connor HJ; Ellis WR; Manning AP; Lintott DJ; McMahon MJ; Axon AT Endoscopy; 1988 Sep; 20(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 3168937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]