These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2798075)

  • 21. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent.
    Schwab SJ; Hlatky MA; Pieper KS; Davidson CJ; Morris KG; Skelton TN; Bashore TM
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan; 320(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 2643042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Iopamidol in urography. A comparison between ionic and nonionic contrast media in patients with normal and impaired renal function.
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Urol Radiol; 1982; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7101596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Must the patient fast before intravascular injection of a non-ionic contrast medium? Results of a controlled study].
    Wagner HJ; Evers JP; Hoppe M; Klose KJ
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 9198507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the drip infusion and bolus techniques in excretory urography as a routine examination.
    Claypool HR; Lind TA; Haber K; Freundlich IM
    Ariz Med; 1975 Aug; 32(7):552-5. PubMed ID: 1147788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies.
    Jahn H; Müller-Späth R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 3D excretory MR urography: improved image quality with intravenous saline and diuretic administration.
    Ergen FB; Hussain HK; Carlos RC; Johnson TD; Adusumilli S; Weadock WJ; Korobkin M; Francis IR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):783-9. PubMed ID: 17335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Complement activation after the intravascular administration of contrast media: a comparison between ionic and nonionic x-ray contrast media].
    Hoffmeister HM; Fuhrer G; Platten HP; Heller W
    Rofo; 1987 Dec; 147(6):673-5. PubMed ID: 2827265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
    Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
    Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Hemodynamic effects of non-ionic iomeprol 350 and ionic diatrizoate 370 during levocardiography and coronary angiography--double-blind randomized comparison of 2 contrast media].
    Lins M; Röhling D; Zahorsky R; Höfig M; Herrmann G; Simon R
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Sep; 83(9):626-33. PubMed ID: 7801664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preparation of outpatients for excretory urography: is bowel preparation with laxatives and dietary restrictions necessary?
    Schuster GA; Nazos D; Lewis GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jun; 164(6):1425-8. PubMed ID: 7754886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effects of urography performed twice at a close interval with contrast media on renal function and morphology in rabbits].
    Higashi S; Yasukochi H; Ishioka K; Sugiyama T; Narasaki K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jul; 54(8):725-36. PubMed ID: 8072862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Nephrotoxicity of contrast media. Comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate by measurement of urinary enzymes after urography].
    Schiavina G; Arrigo G; Vergnaghi D; Cavaliere G; Scarduelli B; Luzzatti G; D'Amico G
    Radiol Med; 1984 Apr; 70(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 6150520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [First results by means of non-ionic contrast medium (Iopamidol) in urography and angiography (author's transl)].
    Corsi M; Moretti C; Biasizzo P
    Radiol Med; 1980 Apr; 66(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 7005986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 1. Visualization by bolus injection].
    Ikeuchi T; Hamashima T; Sakamoto M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 2343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with macroscopic haematuria.
    Stacul F; Cova M; Pravato M; Floriani I
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Apr; 13(4):810-4. PubMed ID: 12664121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of ioversol in intravenous urography. A comparative double-blind study versus iopamidol].
    Joffre F; Rousseau H; Aziza R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):288-92. PubMed ID: 1296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.