These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981197)

  • 1. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method.
    Ramos D; Haraksim R; Meuwly D
    Data Brief; 2017 Feb; 10():75-92. PubMed ID: 27981197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance Study of a Score-based Likelihood Ratio System for Forensic Fingermark Comparison.
    Leegwater AJ; Meuwly D; Sjerps M; Vergeer P; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):626-640. PubMed ID: 28168685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation.
    Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
    Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on likelihood ratio evaluation method of fingerprint evidence based on parameter estimation method.
    Li K; Han Y; Luo Y
    Forensic Sci Res; 2024 Mar; 9(1):owae002. PubMed ID: 38545405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
    Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods.
    Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.
    de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-to-End Automated Latent Fingerprint Identification With Improved DCNN-FFT Enhancement.
    Deshpande UU; Malemath VS; Patil SM; Chaugule SV
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():594412. PubMed ID: 33501354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?
    Vergeer P; van Es A; de Jongh A; Alberink I; Stoel R
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):482-491. PubMed ID: 27914556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):87-98. PubMed ID: 23153799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of Close Non-Match fingerprints similar in delta regions of whorls on fingerprint identification.
    Li K; Wu D; Ai L; Luo Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1482-1494. PubMed ID: 33634870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.