139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981270)
1. Retrospective evaluation of posterior composite
resin sandwich restorations with Herculite XRV:
18-year findings.
Alonso V; Darriba IL; Caserío M
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 27981270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 18297828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
Ferdianakis K; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.
van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Permeability evaluation after decay removal in primary teeth with current caries-excavation techniques.
Shabzendedar M; Moosavi H; Talbi M; Sharifi M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 22269234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
