181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981492)
1. Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?
Klose J; Tarantino I; Kulu Y; Bruckner T; Trefz S; Schmidt T; Schneider M; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 May; 21(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 27981492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis.
Konanz J; Herrle F; Weiss C; Post S; Kienle P
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 May; 28(5):679-88. PubMed ID: 23571868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fecal continence and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection plus perineal colostomy for ultra-low rectal cancer.
Dumont F; Ayadi M; Goéré D; Honoré C; Elias D
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 108(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 23868337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life.
Barisic G; Markovic V; Popovic M; Dimitrijevic I; Gavrilovic P; Krivokapic Z
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jun; 13(6):638-43. PubMed ID: 20184636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.
Yamada K; Saiki Y; Takano S; Iwamoto K; Tanaka M; Fukunaga M; Noguchi T; Nakamura Y; Hisano S; Fukami K; Kuwahara D; Tsuji Y; Takano M; Usuku K; Ikeda T; Sugihara K
Surg Today; 2019 Apr; 49(4):275-285. PubMed ID: 30604217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Efficacy of Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
He Z; Peng B; Chen W; Zhu J; Chen B; Li G; Cao J; Li W
Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1009-1017. PubMed ID: 34783266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y; Shida D; Ochiai H; Mazaki J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 May; 32(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 28091845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1248-56. PubMed ID: 25561197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study.
Rubinkiewicz M; Zarzycki P; Czerwińska A; Wysocki M; Gajewska N; Torbicz G; Budzyński A; Pędziwiatr M
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):218. PubMed ID: 30404633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial longitudinal resection of the anorectum and sphincter for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: a surgical approach to avoid permanent colostomy.
Cong JC; Chen CS; Zhang H; Qiao L; Liu EQ
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jun; 14(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 21689354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Li Z; Wang Q; Ning W; Yang Q; Huang Y; Yan S; Yang B; Xie M
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6852-6860. PubMed ID: 37308763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control analysis.
Sun G; Zang Y; Ding H; Chen Y; Groothof D; Gong H; Lou Z; Meng R; Chen Z; Furnee E; Xiang J; Zhang W
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 27(12):1275-1287. PubMed ID: 37248369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases.
Chau A; Frasson M; Debove C; Maggiori L; Panis Y
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 27631305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis.
Ozgen Z; Ozden S; Atasoy BM; Ozyurt H; Gencosmanoglu R; Imeryuz N
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Aug; 10():168. PubMed ID: 26264590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Chamlou R; Parc Y; Simon T; Bennis M; Dehni N; Parc R; Tiret E
Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):916-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18043092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
