These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981777)

  • 1. Enough is enough … a call to action to improve ethical and governance review processes in Australia.
    Evans SM; Zalcberg JR
    Intern Med J; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1362-1364. PubMed ID: 27981777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
    Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research.
    Finkelstein JA; Brickman AL; Capron A; Ford DE; Gombosev A; Greene SM; Iafrate RP; Kolaczkowski L; Pallin SC; Pletcher MJ; Staman KL; Vazquez MA; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 26374685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
    White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
    Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical review of research on human subjects at Unilever: reflections on governance.
    Sheehan M; Marti V; Roberts T
    Bioethics; 2014 Jul; 28(6):284-92. PubMed ID: 23841908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.
    Duplancic C; Crough T; Bell SC;
    Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30417974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.
    Suzuki M; Sato K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):256-66. PubMed ID: 27534589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to distinguish research from quality improvement.
    Cooper JA; McNair L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 25819760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do all services provided as part of a clinical trial require research ethics and governance review?
    Kenner J; Zalcberg JR
    Intern Med J; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1197-1199. PubMed ID: 28994255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
    Gelling L
    Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The other face of research governance.
    Jones AM; Bamford B
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ethical oversight of learning health care activities in Switzerland: a qualitative study.
    McLennan S
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2019 Oct; 31(8):G81-G86. PubMed ID: 31066452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential solutions to improve the governance of multicentre health services research.
    Clay-Williams R; Taylor N; Braithwaite J
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):152-154. PubMed ID: 29490214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
    Ashcroft RE
    New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ethical review and clinical observations].
    Malbrán A
    Medicina (B Aires); 2015; 75(4):272. PubMed ID: 26339888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple ethical review in North-South collaborative research: the experience of the Ebola-Tx trial in Guinea.
    De Crop M; Delamou A; Griensven JV; Ravinetto R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 26826351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Ethical review of research in the grey area. The Ethical Review Act should be widened and case management more efficient].
    Lafolie P; Agahi N
    Lakartidningen; 2015 Feb; 112():. PubMed ID: 25710225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viewpoint: a method to estimate the cost in lives of ethics board review of biomedical research.
    Whitney SN; Schneider CE
    J Intern Med; 2011 Apr; 269(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 21410788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.