153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981810)
1. Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.
Smith-Ryan AE; Blue MNM; Trexler ET; Hirsch KR
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):220-226. PubMed ID: 27981810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility and validity of A-mode ultrasound for body composition measurement and classification in overweight and obese men and women.
Smith-Ryan AE; Fultz SN; Melvin MN; Wingfield HL; Woessner MN
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91750. PubMed ID: 24618841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity.
Semiz S; Ozgören E; Sabir N
Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jan; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16788571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seven-site versus three-site method of body composition using BodyMetrix ultrasound compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Baranauskas MN; Johnson KE; Juvancic-Heltzel JA; Kappler RM; Richardson L; Jamieson S; Otterstetter R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 May; 37(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 26490540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of an ultrasound system for estimating adipose tissue.
Loenneke JP; Barnes JT; Wagganer JD; Wilson JM; Lowery RP; Green CE; Pujol TJ
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 Mar; 34(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 23879395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the 4-compartment model using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived body volume in overweight individuals.
Blue MNM; Hirsch KR; Trexler ET; Smith-Ryan AE
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2018 Jul; 43(7):742-746. PubMed ID: 29474800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between ultrasound protocols for the estimation of body fat percentage: Comparison to a four-compartment model.
Sullivan K; Metoyer CJ; Winchester LJ; Esco MR; Fedewa MV
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2023 Sep; 43(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 37218394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound measurement of total body fat in obese adolescents.
Pineau JC; Lalys L; Bocquet M; Guihard-Costa AM; Polak M; Frelut ML; Peres G; Dabbas-Tyan M
Ann Nutr Metab; 2010; 56(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 20016146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for lean body mass, fat mass and percent fat in adults using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006.
Lee DH; Keum N; Hu FB; Orav EJ; Rimm EB; Sun Q; Willett WC; Giovannucci EL
Br J Nutr; 2017 Nov; 118(10):858-866. PubMed ID: 29110742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of DXA-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women.
Eston RG; Rowlands AV; Charlesworth S; Davies A; Hoppitt T
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 May; 59(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15798775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of a portable computer-based ultrasound system for estimating adipose tissue in female gymnasts.
Loenneke JP; Barnes JT; Wagganer JD; Pujol TJ
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 Sep; 34(5):410-2. PubMed ID: 24690403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults.
Demura S; Sato S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Sep; 213(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17785953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplified method of clinical phenotyping for older men and women using established field-based measures.
Fukuda DH; Smith-Ryan AE; Kendall KL; Moon JR; Stout JR
Exp Gerontol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):1479-88. PubMed ID: 24140621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of BMI-Based Body Fat Equations in Men and Women: A 4-Compartment Model Comparison.
Nickerson BS; Esco MR; Bishop PA; Fedewa MV; Snarr RL; Kliszczewicz BM; Park KS
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Jan; 32(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 28033125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a four-compartment model validation of laboratory and field methods.
Kendall KL; Fukuda DH; Hyde PN; Smith-Ryan AE; Moon JR; Stout JR
J Sports Sci; 2017 Apr; 35(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 27159216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validity of an equation based on anthropometry to estimate body fat in older adults].
Huerta RH; Esparza-Romero J; Urquidez R; Pacheco BI; Valencia ME; Alemán-Mateo H
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2007 Dec; 57(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 18524320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of anthropometric variables to predict relative body fat determined by a four-compartment body composition model.
van der Ploeg GE; Gunn SM; Withers RT; Modra AC
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 12879096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat.
Wagner DR
J Obes; 2013; 2013():280713. PubMed ID: 24062944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
Ramirez ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
