BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27981917)

  • 1. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.
    Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Software: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness Compared with Human Graders.
    Tufail A; Rudisill C; Egan C; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Srinivas S; Nittala M; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Mar; 124(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 28024825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy grading by an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm compared with a human standard for wide-field true-colour confocal scanning and standard digital retinal images.
    Olvera-Barrios A; Heeren TF; Balaskas K; Chambers R; Bolter L; Egan C; Tufail A; Anderson J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 32376611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of whether automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment could replace manual grading steps in the English National Screening Programme.
    Kapetanakis VV; Rudnicka AR; Liew G; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Bolter L; Anderson J; Egan C; Salas-Vega S; Rudisill C; Taylor P; Tufail A
    J Med Screen; 2015 Sep; 22(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 25742804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm for automated diabetic retinopathy screening of 30 000 patients.
    Heydon P; Egan C; Bolter L; Chambers R; Anderson J; Aldington S; Stratton IM; Scanlon PH; Webster L; Mann S; du Chemin A; Owen CG; Tufail A; Rudnicka AR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 105(5):723-728. PubMed ID: 32606081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multimodal imaging interpreted by graders to detect re-activation of diabetic eye disease in previously treated patients: the EMERALD diagnostic accuracy study.
    Lois N; Cook J; Wang A; Aldington S; Mistry H; Maredza M; McAuley D; Aslam T; Bailey C; Chong V; Ghanchi F; Scanlon P; Sivaprasad S; Steel D; Styles C; Azuara-Blanco A; Prior L; Waugh N
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(32):1-104. PubMed ID: 34060440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Value of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with the EyeArt System: A Study of More Than 100,000 Consecutive Encounters from People with Diabetes.
    Bhaskaranand M; Ramachandra C; Bhat S; Cuadros J; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Solanki K
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Nov; 21(11):635-643. PubMed ID: 31335200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EyeArt artificial intelligence analysis of diabetic retinopathy in retinal screening events.
    Vought R; Vought V; Shah M; Szirth B; Bhagat N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 43(12):4851-4859. PubMed ID: 37847478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. THEIA™ development, and testing of artificial intelligence-based primary triage of diabetic retinopathy screening images in New Zealand.
    Vaghefi E; Yang S; Xie L; Hill S; Schmiedel O; Murphy R; Squirrell D
    Diabet Med; 2021 Apr; 38(4):e14386. PubMed ID: 32794618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility and accuracy of the screening for diabetic retinopathy using a fundus camera and an artificial intelligence pre-evaluation application.
    Piatti A; Romeo F; Manti R; Doglio M; Tartaglino B; Nada E; Giorda CB
    Acta Diabetol; 2024 Jan; 61(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 37676288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
    Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland.
    Scotland GS; McNamee P; Philip S; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Prescott GJ; Fonseca S; Sharp PF; Olson JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1518-23. PubMed ID: 17585001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of targeted diabetic retinopathy training for graders in Vietnam and the implications for future diabetic retinopathy screening programmes: a diagnostic test accuracy study.
    Curran K; Congdon N; Hoang TT; Lohfeld L; Nguyen VT; Nguyen HT; Nguyen QN; Dardis C; Virgili G; Piyasena P; Tran H; Salongcay RP; Tung MQ; Peto T
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e059205. PubMed ID: 36691192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
    Islam FMA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence for teleophthalmology-based diabetic retinopathy screening in a national programme: an economic analysis modelling study.
    Xie Y; Nguyen QD; Hamzah H; Lim G; Bellemo V; Gunasekeran DV; Yip MYT; Qi Lee X; Hsu W; Li Lee M; Tan CS; Tym Wong H; Lamoureux EL; Tan GSW; Wong TY; Finkelstein EA; Ting DSW
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 May; 2(5):e240-e249. PubMed ID: 33328056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic test accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by physician graders using a hand-held non-mydriatic retinal camera at a tertiary level medical clinic.
    Piyasena MMPN; Yip JLY; MacLeod D; Kim M; Gudlavalleti VSM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):89. PubMed ID: 30961576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of automated "disease/no disease" grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme.
    Philip S; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Fonseca S; McNamee P; Scotland GS; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Olson JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1512-7. PubMed ID: 17504851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of digital imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
    Sharp PF; Olson J; Strachan F; Hipwell J; Ludbrook A; O'Donnell M; Wallace S; Goatman K; Grant A; Waugh N; McHardy K; Forrester JV
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(30):1-119. PubMed ID: 14604499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.
    Scotland GS; McNamee P; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Philip S; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Williams GJ; Wykes W; Leese GP; Olson JA;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 19965826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.