These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27982191)

  • 21. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics.
    Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment.
    Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 8(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15469443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images.
    Tosoni GM; Lurie AG; Cowan AE; Burleson JA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 16876068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring cortical thickness on panoramic radiographs: a validation study of the Mental Index.
    Dutra V; Susin C; da Costa NP; Veeck EB; Bahlis A; Fernandes Ada R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17656120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Localization of mental and mandibular foramens on the conventional and digital panoramic images.
    Peker I; Gungor K; Semiz M; Tekdemir I
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Sep; 33(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 19860115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
    Tengowski MW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical trial of panoramic dental radiography using a CCD receptor.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):169-71. PubMed ID: 9735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.
    Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image compression impact on quantitative angiogenesis analysis of ovarian epithelial neoplasms.
    Nicolosi JS; Yoshida AO; Sarian LO; Silva CA; Andrade LA; Derchain SF; Vassallo J; Schenka AA
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2012 Jan; 20(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21836501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
    Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of computational measurement of the condyles on digital panoramic radiographs.
    Momjian A; Courvoisier D; Kiliaridis S; Scolozzi P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Oct; 40(7):444-50. PubMed ID: 21960403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
    Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.