338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27982750)
1. Impact of Evidence Type and Judicial Warning on Juror Perceptions of Global and Specific Witness Evidence.
Wheatcroft JM; Keogan H
J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 151(3):247-267. PubMed ID: 27982750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.
LaBat DE; Goldfarb D; Evans JR; Compo NS; Koolmees CJ; LaPorte G; Lothridge K
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Oct; 47(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 37603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum: The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism.
Crane L; Wilcock R; Maras KL; Chui W; Marti-Sanchez C; Henry LA
J Autism Dev Disord; 2020 May; 50(5):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 30056502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence.
Sauer JD; Palmer MA; Brewer N
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 28191988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
Eastwood J; Caldwell J
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
Ryan N; Westera N
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
