BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27983849)

  • 1. On-the-Fly QM/MM Docking with Attracting Cavities.
    Chaskar P; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 27983849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward on-the-fly quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) docking: development and benchmark of a scoring function.
    Chaskar P; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3137-52. PubMed ID: 25296988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How accurate is the description of ligand-protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?
    Kollar J; Frecer V
    J Mol Model; 2017 Dec; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 29234892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attracting Cavities 2.0: Improving the Flexibility and Robustness for Small-Molecule Docking.
    Röhrig UF; Goullieux M; Bugnon M; Zoete V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jun; 63(12):3925-3940. PubMed ID: 37285197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantum-Mechanics Methodologies in Drug Discovery: Applications of Docking and Scoring in Lead Optimization.
    Crespo A; Rodriguez-Granillo A; Lim VT
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(23):2663-2680. PubMed ID: 28685695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attracting cavities for docking. Replacing the rough energy landscape of the protein by a smooth attracting landscape.
    Zoete V; Schuepbach T; Bovigny C; Chaskar P; Daina A; Röhrig UF; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Feb; 37(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 26558715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach.
    Cho AE; Guallar V; Berne BJ; Friesner R
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jul; 26(9):915-31. PubMed ID: 15841474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between performance of QM/MM docking and simple classification of binding sites.
    Chung JY; Hah JM; Cho AE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2382-7. PubMed ID: 19799409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-Step Covalent Docking with Attracting Cavities.
    Goullieux M; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7847-7859. PubMed ID: 38049143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-throughput quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (ONIOM) macromolecular crystallographic refinement with PHENIX/DivCon: the impact of mixed Hamiltonian methods on ligand and protein structure.
    Borbulevych O; Martin RI; Westerhoff LM
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2018 Nov; 74(Pt 11):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 30387765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. pKa calculations in solution and proteins with QM/MM free energy perturbation simulations: a quantitative test of QM/MM protocols.
    Riccardi D; Schaefer P; Cui Q
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 Sep; 109(37):17715-33. PubMed ID: 16853267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Differential Evolution Approach to Protein⁻Ligand Docking.
    Lin H; Siu SWI
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30326669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum Mechanics-Based Fast and Reliable Prediction of Binding Pose Structures.
    Al-Ansi AY; Al-Shawesh GH; Ru X; Lin Z
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Jun; 128(25):6059-6070. PubMed ID: 38875526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SwissDock 2024: major enhancements for small-molecule docking with Attracting Cavities and AutoDock Vina.
    Bugnon M; Röhrig UF; Goullieux M; Perez MAS; Daina A; Michielin O; Zoete V
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Jul; 52(W1):W324-W332. PubMed ID: 38686803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Assessment of Seven Docking Programs on a Nonredundant Metalloprotein Subset of the PDBbind Refined.
    Çınaroğlu SS; Timuçin E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3846-3859. PubMed ID: 31460757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theoretical Study of Protein-Ligand Interactions Using the Molecules-in-Molecules Fragmentation-Based Method.
    Thapa B; Beckett D; Erickson J; Raghavachari K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Oct; 14(10):5143-5155. PubMed ID: 30265003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.