These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27984798)

  • 1. Alchemical determination of drug-receptor binding free energy: Where we stand and where we could move to.
    Procacci P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():233-241. PubMed ID: 27984798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
    Procacci P; Guarnieri G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33392950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. I. Dissociation free energies of drug-receptor systems via non-equilibrium alchemical simulations: a theoretical framework.
    Procacci P
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 18(22):14991-5004. PubMed ID: 27193067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.
    Lee TS; Allen BK; Giese TJ; Guo Z; Li P; Lin C; McGee TD; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Tao Y; Tsai HC; Xu H; Sherman W; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5595-5623. PubMed ID: 32936637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. II. Dissociation free energies in drug-receptor systems via nonequilibrium alchemical simulations: application to the FK506-related immunophilin ligands.
    Nerattini F; Chelli R; Procacci P
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 18(22):15005-18. PubMed ID: 27193181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.
    Mobley DL; Klimovich PV
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(23):230901. PubMed ID: 23267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Hamiltonian Replica Exchange via Lambda-Hopping Enhance the Sampling in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations?
    Procacci P
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addressing Suboptimal Poses in Nonequilibrium Alchemical Calculations.
    Karrenbrock M; Rizzi V; Procacci P; Gervasio FL
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1595-1605. PubMed ID: 38323915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding Free Energies of Host-Guest Systems by Nonequilibrium Alchemical Simulations with Constrained Dynamics: Illustrative Calculations and Numerical Validation.
    Giovannelli E; Cioni M; Procacci P; Cardini G; Pagliai M; Volkov V; Chelli R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):5887-5899. PubMed ID: 29112430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative Binding Free Energy between Chemically Distant Compounds Using a Bidirectional Nonequilibrium Approach.
    Procacci P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):4014-4026. PubMed ID: 35642423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
    Procacci P; Guarnieri G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31624982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced Free Energy Perturbation/Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Method with Unbiased Alchemical Thermodynamic Axis.
    Jiang W; Thirman J; Jo S; Roux B
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(41):9435-9442. PubMed ID: 30253098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations on Membrane-Associated Proteins.
    Papadourakis M; Sinenka H; Matricon P; Hénin J; Brannigan G; Pérez-Benito L; Pande V; van Vlijmen H; de Graaf C; Deflorian F; Tresadern G; Cecchini M; Cournia Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(21):7437-7458. PubMed ID: 37902715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological uncertainties in drug-receptor binding free energy predictions based on classical molecular dynamics.
    Procacci P
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2021 Apr; 67():127-134. PubMed ID: 33220532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding Free Energies of Host-Guest Systems by Nonequilibrium Alchemical Simulations with Constrained Dynamics: Theoretical Framework.
    Giovannelli E; Procacci P; Cardini G; Pagliai M; Volkov V; Chelli R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):5874-5886. PubMed ID: 28992706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
    Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A remark on the efficiency of the double-system/single-box nonequilibrium approach in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
    Procacci P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Jun; 34(6):635-639. PubMed ID: 32277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.