These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27984802)

  • 1. Microbial soil community analyses for forensic science: Application to a blind test.
    Demanèche S; Schauser L; Dawson L; Franqueville L; Simonet P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():153-158. PubMed ID: 27984802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soil characterisation by bacterial community analysis for forensic applications: A quantitative comparison of environmental technologies.
    Habtom H; Demanèche S; Dawson L; Azulay C; Matan O; Robe P; Gafny R; Simonet P; Jurkevitch E; Pasternak Z
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():21-29. PubMed ID: 27750077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bacterial Profiling of Soil For Forensic Investigations: Consideration of Ex Situ Changes in Questioned and Known Soil Samples.
    Foran DR; Badgley AJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):471-480. PubMed ID: 31584712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():176-84. PubMed ID: 25151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the origin of soil evidence: High throughput eukaryote sequencing and MIR spectroscopy applied to a crime scene scenario.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Breen J; Macdonald LM; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():22-31. PubMed ID: 25839677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the link between evidence and crime scene through soil bacterial and fungal microbiome: A mock case in forensic study.
    Karadayı S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Dec; 329():111060. PubMed ID: 34736047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Next-Generation Sequencing of the Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene for Forensic Soil Comparison: A Feasibility Study.
    Jesmok EM; Hopkins JM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):607-17. PubMed ID: 27122396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference Analysis Based on 16S rRNA Sequencing of Different Soil Bacterial Communities.
    Song GQ; Li H; Ma K; Zhao XY; Shen YW; Xie JH; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 35(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 31135113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and function.
    Nkongolo KK; Narendrula-Kotha R
    J Appl Genet; 2020 May; 61(2):249-263. PubMed ID: 32062778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioinformatics Approach to Assess the Biogeographical Patterns of Soil Communities: The Utility for Soil Provenance.
    Damaso N; Mendel J; Mendoza M; von Wettberg EJ; Narasimhan G; Mills D
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 29357400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial traces and their role in forensic science.
    Speruda M; Piecuch A; Borzęcka J; Kadej M; Ogórek R
    J Appl Microbiol; 2022 Apr; 132(4):2547-2557. PubMed ID: 34954826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbiome-based body site of origin classification of forensically relevant blood traces.
    Díez López C; Montiel González D; Haas C; Vidaki A; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102280. PubMed ID: 32244163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations.
    Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time Radically Alters Ex Situ Evidentiary Soil 16S Bacterial Profiles Produced Via Next-Generation Sequencing,
    Badgley AJ; Jesmok EM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1356-1365. PubMed ID: 29464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating the microbiome as a resource in the forensics toolkit.
    Clarke TH; Gomez A; Singh H; Nelson KE; Brinkac LM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():141-147. PubMed ID: 28728057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying microbial biogeography in soil forensics.
    Habtom H; Pasternak Z; Matan O; Azulay C; Gafny R; Jurkevitch E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():195-203. PubMed ID: 30447564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-throughput Sequencing of Trace Quantities of Soil Provides Reproducible and Discriminative Fungal DNA Profiles.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):478-484. PubMed ID: 27404621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-automated genetic analyses of soil microbial communities: comparison of T-RFLP and RISA based on descriptive and discriminative statistical approaches.
    Hartmann M; Frey B; Kölliker R; Widmer F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Jun; 61(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 15767011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.