300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27986704)
1. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 27986704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of the Fecal and Oral Microbiome over 2 Years at -80°C for Multiple Collection Methods.
Zouiouich S; Byrd DA; Hua X; Karwa S; Wan Y; Shi J; Humphrey GC; Ackermann GL; Knight R; Abnet CC; Vogtmann E; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Mar; 32(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 36649143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Fecal Sample Collection Methods for Microbial Analysis Embedded within Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.
Zouiouich S; Mariadassou M; Rué O; Vogtmann E; Huybrechts I; Severi G; Boutron-Ruault MC; Senore C; Naccarati A; Mengozzi G; Kozlakidis Z; Jenab M; Sinha R; Gunter MJ; Leclerc M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2022 Feb; 31(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 34782392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples for Discovery Metabolomics in Epidemiologic Studies.
Loftfield E; Vogtmann E; Sampson JN; Moore SC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(11):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 27543620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Collecting Fecal Samples for Microbiome Analyses in Epidemiology Studies.
Sinha R; Chen J; Amir A; Vogtmann E; Shi J; Inman KS; Flores R; Sampson J; Knight R; Chia N
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Feb; 25(2):407-16. PubMed ID: 26604270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Oral Collection Methods for Studies of Microbiota.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Amir A; Shi J; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Barmon B; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Abnet CC; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Jan; 28(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30262598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
