These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27987031)

  • 1. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
    Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
    Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
    Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
    J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
    Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
    Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
    Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
    Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P
    Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
    Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
    J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
    Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
    Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Hughes T; Pietropaolo A; Jones P; Oderda M; Gontero P; Somani BK
    Curr Urol Rep; 2021 Jun; 22(8):41. PubMed ID: 34128107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
    Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
    Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
    Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope.
    Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope: A Multi-Institutional International Study.
    Scotland K; Wong VKF; Chan JYH; Tawfiek E; Chiura A; Chew BH; Bagley D
    J Endourol; 2020 Sep; 34(9):981-986. PubMed ID: 32578453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparison of flexible fiberoptic and digital cystoscopes.
    Okhunov Z; Hruby GW; Mirabile G; Marruffo F; Lehman DS; Benson MC; Gupta M; Landman J
    Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 19501889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
    Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA Intradetrusor Injection Needle Performance with Modern Flexible Cystoscopes.
    Williams RD; Dove J; Petrou SP; Thiel DD
    J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1309-13. PubMed ID: 26086680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
    Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
    Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S
    BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use
    Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD
    J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.