227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27987646)
1. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.
Yu-Kang T
Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):957-963. PubMed ID: 27987646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis.
Tu YK
Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1120-5. PubMed ID: 26686799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
Shih MC; Tu YK
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evidence-splitting approach to evaluation of direct-indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Shih MC; Tu YK
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 33543575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
van Valkenhoef G; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 26461181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostics for generalized linear hierarchical models in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Carlin BP
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28683516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the consistency assumptions underlying network meta-regression using aggregate data.
Donegan S; Dias S; Welton NJ
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 30367548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Turner RM; Band T; Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Higgins JPT; Carpenter JR; White IR
Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):4917-4930. PubMed ID: 37767752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Qin L; Zhao S; Guo W; Tong T; Yang K
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38965066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis.
Tu YK
Med Decis Making; 2014 Oct; 34(7):911-8. PubMed ID: 25260872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence inconsistency degrees of freedom in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Lin L
J Biopharm Stat; 2021 May; 31(3):317-330. PubMed ID: 33296239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
Spineli LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.
Higgins JP; Jackson D; Barrett JK; Lu G; Ades AE; White IR
Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 26062084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Jackson D; Barrett JK; Rice S; White IR; Higgins JP
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3639-54. PubMed ID: 24777711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
Tu YK; Wu YC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A REML method for the evidence-splitting model in network meta-analysis.
Piepho HP; Forkman J; Malik WA
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 38037262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
