BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2798840)

  • 1. [New possibilities and aspects of low-field magnetic resonance tomography].
    Grönemeyer DH; Kaufman L; Rothschild P; Seibel RM
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 2798840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accessible magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kaufman L; Arakawa M; Hale J; Rothschild P; Carlson J; Hake K; Kramer D; Lu W; Van Heteren J
    Magn Reson Q; 1989 Oct; 5(4):283-97. PubMed ID: 2640910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.
    Hailey D
    Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Nov; (92):1-4. PubMed ID: 17086657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging systems. A guide to the technology.
    Health Devices; 2005 Apr; 34(4):117-38. PubMed ID: 15945465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interventional and intraoperative MRI at low field scanner--a review.
    Blanco RT; Ojala R; Kariniemi J; Perälä J; Niinimäki J; Tervonen O
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 15908156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging system: clinical experience and technical considerations.
    Szelényi A; Gasser T; Seifert V
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):268-75; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 18981832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla.
    Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Watkins DM; Buecker A; Schneider G
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):238-52. PubMed ID: 18850504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetric MRI magnet design using a hybrid numerical method.
    Zhao H; Crozier S; Doddrell DM
    J Magn Reson; 1999 Dec; 141(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 10579958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of the pressure gradient in children with coarctation of the aorta by low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rupprecht T; Nitz W; Wagner M; Kreissler P; Rascher W; Hofbeck M
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2002; 23(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 11889521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-tesla high-field applications.
    Kim PD; Truwit CL; Hall WA
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2009 Apr; 20(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19555879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing 0.2 tesla with 1.5 tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of setup, workflow, and efficiency.
    Nimsky C; Ganslandt O; Fahlbusch R
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1065-79. PubMed ID: 16099691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Future perspectives for intraoperative MRI.
    Jolesz FA
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Jan; 16(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 15561539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
    Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
    Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A variable torque motor compatible with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Roeck WW; Ha SH; Farmaka S; Nalcioglu O
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Apr; 80(4):046108. PubMed ID: 19405704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T.
    Briellmann RS; Pell GS; Wellard RM; Mitchell LA; Abbott DF; Jackson GD
    Epileptic Disord; 2003 Mar; 5(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 12773291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
    Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical applications of an instrument of resistive-type magnetic resonance of new design].
    Pozzi Mucelli RS; Brody WB
    Radiol Med; 1987 Oct; 74(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 3671795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.