These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

675 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27989791)

  • 1. Coronary sinus activation patterns in patients with and without left bundle branch block undergoing electroanatomic mapping system-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.
    Del Greco M; Zorzi A; Di Matteo I; Cima A; Maines M; Angheben C; Catanzariti D
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Feb; 14(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 27989791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coronary sinus and great cardiac vein electroanatomic mapping predicts the activation delay of the coronary sinus branches.
    Maines M; Peruzza F; Zorzi A; Moggio P; Angheben C; Catanzariti D; Coletti M; Pangrazzi C; Del Greco M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32525574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation determined by electroanatomic mapping in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Mafi Rad M; Wijntjens GW; Engels EB; Blaauw Y; Luermans JG; Pison L; Crijns HJ; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Jan; 13(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 26232766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinctive Left Ventricular Activations Associated With ECG Pattern in Heart Failure Patients.
    Derval N; Duchateau J; Mahida S; Eschalier R; Sacher F; Lumens J; Cochet H; Denis A; Pillois X; Yamashita S; Komatsu Y; Ploux S; Amraoui S; Zemmoura A; Ritter P; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Jaïs P; Bordachar P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28630171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
    Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
    Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Left ventricular lead placement in the latest activated region guided by coronary venous electroanatomic mapping.
    Rad MM; Blaauw Y; Dinh T; Pison L; Crijns HJ; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 25186457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.
    Kutyifa V; Stockburger M; Daubert JP; Holmqvist F; Olshansky B; Schuger C; Klein H; Goldenberg I; Brenyo A; McNitt S; Merkely B; Zareba W; Moss AJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Aug; 7(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 24963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.
    Marek JJ; Saba S; Onishi T; Ryo K; Schwartzman D; Adelstein EC; Gorcsan J
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 24169014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology.
    Ploux S; Lumens J; Whinnett Z; Montaudon M; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Derval N; Zemmoura A; Denis A; De Guillebon M; Shah A; Hocini M; Jaïs P; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Wilkoff BL; Bordachar P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 61(24):2435-2443. PubMed ID: 23602768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Zusterzeel R; Spatz ES; Curtis JP; Sanders WE; Selzman KA; Piña IL; Bao H; Ponirakis A; Varosy PD; Masoudi FA; Caños DA; Strauss DG
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2015 Mar; 8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. PubMed ID: 25714821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
    Zhang W; Huang J; Qi Y; Wang F; Guo L; Shi X; Wu W; Zhou X; Li R
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Dec; 16(12):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 31513945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping of the coronary veins during cardiac resynchronization therapy implant: feasibility and possible applications.
    Niazi I; Ryu K; Hood R; Choudhuri I; Akhtar M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 41(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 25005455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ECG parameters predict left ventricular conduction delay in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Pastore G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Zanon F; Noventa F; Corbucci G; Baracca E; Aggio S; Picariello C; Lanza D; Rigatelli G; Carraro M; Roncon L; Barold SS
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Dec; 13(12):2289-2296. PubMed ID: 27424074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcoronary mapping of ventricular asynchrony due to left bundle branch block in a porcine model.
    Heinroth KM; Unverzagt S; Mahnkopf D; Plehn A; Buerke M; Werdan K; Prondzinsky R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 26(10):520-6. PubMed ID: 25274862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary sinus lead delay index for optimization of coronary sinus lead placement.
    Koç M; Kaypakli O; Gözübüyük G; Yıldıray Şahin D
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2018 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28557338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).
    Zareba W; Klein H; Cygankiewicz I; Hall WJ; McNitt S; Brown M; Cannom D; Daubert JP; Eldar M; Gold MR; Goldberger JJ; Goldenberg I; Lichstein E; Pitschner H; Rashtian M; Solomon S; Viskin S; Wang P; Moss AJ;
    Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(10):1061-72. PubMed ID: 21357819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of QRS complex duration and morphology on left ventricular reverse remodelling and left ventricular function improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    van der Bijl P; Khidir M; Leung M; Mertens B; Ajmone Marsan N; Delgado V; Bax JJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 28176418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification.
    Strik M; Ploux S; Huntjens PR; Nguyên UC; Frontera A; Eschalier R; Dubois R; Ritter P; Klotz N; Vernooy K; Haïssaguerre M; Crijns HJGM; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():143-148. PubMed ID: 29895424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different regions of latest electrical activation during left bundle-branch block and right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients determined by coronary venous electro-anatomic mapping.
    Mafi Rad M; Blaauw Y; Dinh T; Pison L; Crijns HJ; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1214-22. PubMed ID: 25315161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.