36 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27989951)
21. Is there an added value of faecal calprotectin and haemoglobin in the diagnostic work-up for primary care patients suspected of significant colorectal disease? A cross-sectional diagnostic study.
Elias SG; Kok L; de Wit NJ; Witteman BJ; Goedhard JG; Romberg-Camps MJ; Muris JW; Moons KG
BMC Med; 2016 Sep; 14(1):141. PubMed ID: 27666114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and validation of a diagnostic prediction model distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis.
Bolkenstein HE; van de Wall BJ; Consten EC; van der Palen J; Broeders IA; Draaisma WA
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018; 53(10-11):1291-1297. PubMed ID: 30394135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of the Rome III criteria is not likely to reduce the number of unnecessary referrals for colonoscopy in primary care.
Kok L; Elias SG; Witteman BJ; Goedhard JG; Romberg-Camps MJ; Muris JW; Moons KG; de Wit NJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 May; 25(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23325277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Identification of patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a case-control study.
Ewing M; Naredi P; Zhang C; Månsson J
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Dec; 66(653):e880-e886. PubMed ID: 27821670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Published diagnostic models safely excluded colorectal cancer in an independent primary care validation study.
Elias SG; Kok L; Witteman BJM; Goedhard JG; Romberg-Camps MJL; Muris JWM; de Wit NJ; Moons KGM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():149-157.e8. PubMed ID: 27989951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(14):1-39. PubMed ID: 26366239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review.
Astin M; Griffin T; Neal RD; Rose P; Hamilton W
Br J Gen Pract; 2011 May; 61(586):e231-43. PubMed ID: 21619747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic value of circulating miR-21 for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Shan L; Ji Q; Cheng G; Xia J; Liu D; Wu C; Zhu B; Ding Y
Cancer Biomark; 2015; 15(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25524942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ford AC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Rodgers CC; Talley NJ; Vakil NB; Moayyedi P
Gut; 2008 Nov; 57(11):1545-53. PubMed ID: 18676420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reimagining the diagnostic pathway for gastrointestinal cancer.
Rubin G; Walter F; Emery J; de Wit N
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 15(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29410534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [New Search]
