These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27990665)
1. Clinical assessment of a new 755 nm diode laser for hair removal: Efficacy, safety and practicality in 56 patients. Royo J; Moreno-Moraga J; Trelles MA Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Apr; 49(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 27990665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eradication of hairy mouth after oncological resection of the tongue and floor mouth using a diode laser 808 nm. Postoperative pain assessment using thermal infrared imaging. Scarano A; Lorusso F; Di Cerbo A; Lucchina AG; Carinci F Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):516-521. PubMed ID: 30614012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical evaluation of hair clearance in darkly pigmented individuals using a novel diode1060 nm wavelength with multiple treatment handpieces: A prospective analysis with modeling and histological findings. Ross EV; Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer S Lasers Surg Med; 2018 Sep; 50(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 29845623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser. Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal. Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs. Ayatollahi A; Samadi A; Rajabi-Estarabadi A; Yadangi S; Nouri K; Firooz A Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Mar; 35(2):373-378. PubMed ID: 31278429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial. Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser. Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique. Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An efficacy comparison of hair removal utilizing a diode laser and an Nd:YAG laser system in Chinese women. Li R; Zhou Z; Gold MH J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2010 Oct; 12(5):213-7. PubMed ID: 20825259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up. Braun M J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study. Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060-nm Large Spot Size, Vacuum-Assisted Hair Removal Diode Laser System in Asian/Pacific Fitzpatrick's Skin Types IV-V Patients. Tahiliani ST; Tahiliani HS J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 28095566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between sequentional treatment with diode and alexandrite lasers versus alexandrite laser alone in the treatment of hirsutism. Nilforoushzadeh MA; Naieni FF; Siadat AH; Rad L J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Nov; 10(11):1255-9. PubMed ID: 22052304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Evaluation of Hair Removal Using an 810 nm Diode Laser With a Novel Scanning Device. Courtney E; Goldberg DJ J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1330-1333. PubMed ID: 28095543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of triple wavelength laser hair reduction in skin types IV to V. Raj Kirit EP; Sivuni A; Ponugupati S; Gold MH J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 20(4):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 33567152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study on the efficacy and safety of a high-power triple wavelength diode laser (810, 940, 1060 nm) for removing fine and less pigmented facial hair on Asian skin. Pall A; Mármol GV J Cosmet Dermatol; 2024 Apr; 23(4):1282-1290. PubMed ID: 38348571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal. Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-reported outcome after diode laser hair removal. Zins JE; Alghoul M; Gonzalez AM; Strumble P Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 60(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18443500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]