These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27990772)

  • 1. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
    Campbell JM; Kavanagh S; Kurmis R; Munn Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2017; 38(2):e552-e567. PubMed ID: 28253213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
    Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
    Yang Q; Xian H; Cheng X; Wu X; Meng J; Chen W; Zeng Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 39107813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
    O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
    Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.
    Cullis PS; Gudlaugsdottir K; Andrews J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175213. PubMed ID: 28384296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.