These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2799127)

  • 1. A comparison of maximum likelihood and Jewell's estimators of the odds ratio and relative risk in single 2 x 2 tables.
    Becker S
    Stat Med; 1989 Aug; 8(8):987-96. PubMed ID: 2799127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of several point estimators of the odds ratio in a single 2 x 2 contingency table.
    Walter SD; Cook RJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):795-811. PubMed ID: 1742440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of maximum likelihood and Jewell's estimator of the odds ratio and relative risk in single 2 x 2 tables.
    Jewell NP
    Stat Med; 1991 Jan; 10(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 2006353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small sample estimation of log odds ratios from logistic regression and fourfold tables.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 4089348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interval estimation of the attributable risk in case-control studies with matched pairs.
    Lui KJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Dec; 55(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 11707482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different maximum likelihood estimators in a small sample logistic regression with two independent binary variables.
    Whaley FS
    Stat Med; 1991 May; 10(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 2068425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.
    Lyles RH; Guo Y; Greenland S
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2012 Dec; 142(12):3235-3241. PubMed ID: 22962519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of epidemiologic case-base studies for binary data.
    Nurminen M
    Stat Med; 1989 Oct; 8(10):1241-54. PubMed ID: 2814072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data.
    Greenland S; Robins JM
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 4005387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of conditional maximum likelihood estimation of a common odds ratio.
    Hauck WW
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1117-23. PubMed ID: 6534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.
    Lui KJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 16820329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1275-85. PubMed ID: 15565736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Notes on interval estimation of the attributable risk in cross-sectional sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1797-809. PubMed ID: 11406842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.
    Greenland S
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 12933529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.