BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27991456)

  • 21. A GPU-based finite-size pencil beam algorithm with 3D-density correction for radiotherapy dose calculation.
    Gu X; Jelen U; Li J; Jia X; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(11):3337-50. PubMed ID: 21558589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prompt-gamma track-length estimator with time tagging from proton tracking.
    Létang JM; Allegrini O; Testa É
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38729180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast CPU-based Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation.
    Ziegenhein P; Pirner S; Ph Kamerling C; Oelfke U
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):6097-111. PubMed ID: 26216484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploration of differentiability in a proton computed tomography simulation framework.
    Aehle M; Alme J; Gábor Barnaföldi G; Blühdorn J; Bodova T; Borshchov V; van den Brink A; Eikeland V; Feofilov G; Garth C; Gauger NR; Grøttvik O; Helstrup H; Igolkin S; Keidel R; Kobdaj C; Kortus T; Kusch L; Leonhardt V; Mehendale S; Ningappa Mulawade R; Harald Odland O; O'Neill G; Papp G; Peitzmann T; Pettersen HES; Piersimoni P; Pochampalli R; Protsenko M; Rauch M; Ur Rehman A; Richter M; Röhrich D; Sagebaum M; Santana J; Schilling A; Seco J; Songmoolnak A; Sudár Á; Tambave G; Tymchuk I; Ullaland K; Varga-Kofarago M; Volz L; Wagner B; Wendzel S; Wiebel A; Xiao R; Yang S; Zillien S
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 68(24):. PubMed ID: 37949060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CPU-GPU-coupled acceleration method for point flux calculation in Monte Carlo particle transport.
    Yanheng P; Zhen W; Yisheng H; Shenshen G; Rui Q; Hui Z; Junli L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(6):525-537. PubMed ID: 38411255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning.
    Wu C; Nguyen D; Xing Y; Montero AB; Schuemann J; Shang H; Pu Y; Jiang S
    Mach Learn Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 2(1):. PubMed ID: 35965743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy.
    Park H; Paganetti H; Schuemann J; Jia X; Min CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(18):. PubMed ID: 34384063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Applying graphics processor units to Monte Carlo dose calculation in radiation therapy.
    Bakhtiari M; Malhotra H; Jones MD; Chaudhary V; Walters JP; Nazareth D
    J Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 35(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 20589122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. GRID-ENABLED TREATMENT PLANNING FOR PROTON THERAPY USING MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS.
    Vadapalli R; Yepes P; Newhauser W; Lichti R
    Nucl Technol; 2011 Jul; 175(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 25505349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acceleration of Approximate Matrix Multiplications on GPUs.
    Okuyama T; Röhm A; Mihana T; Naruse M
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jul; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 37628160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multi-dimensional, mesoscopic Monte Carlo simulations of inhomogeneous reaction-drift-diffusion systems on graphics-processing units.
    Vigelius M; Meyer B
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e33384. PubMed ID: 22506001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MERIT: Controlling Monte-Carlo error rate in large-scale Monte-Carlo hypothesis testing.
    Li Y; Hu YJ; Satten GA
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(2):279-295. PubMed ID: 38124426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Constrained Hybrid Monte Carlo Sampling Made Simple for Chemical Reaction Simulations.
    Jin B; Hu T; Yu K; Xu S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Oct; 19(20):7343-7357. PubMed ID: 37793028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uncertainty quantification analysis and optimization for proton therapy beam lines.
    Rizzoglio V; Adelmann A; Gerbershagen A; Meer D; Nesteruk KP; Schippers JM
    Phys Med; 2020 May; 75():11-18. PubMed ID: 32473518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-efficiency computation for electromagnetic forming process: An explicit-implicit GPU approach.
    Pei Y; Tang D; Li S; Cao X; Yang H; Cai Y; Cui X
    iScience; 2024 Jan; 27(1):108735. PubMed ID: 38235329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thermodynamic calculations using reverse Monte Carlo: Simultaneously tuning multiple short-range order parameters for 2D lattice adsorption problem.
    Haque S; Chatterjee A
    J Chem Phys; 2023 Sep; 159(10):. PubMed ID: 37694750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radial basis point interpolation for strain field calculation in digital image correlation.
    Du J; Zhao J; Liu J; Zhao D
    Appl Opt; 2024 May; 63(14):3929-3943. PubMed ID: 38856357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Multiple Step Active Stiffness Integration Scheme to Couple a Stochastic Cross-Bridge Model and Continuum Mechanics for Uses in Both Basic Research and Clinical Applications of Heart Simulation.
    Yoneda K; Okada JI; Watanabe M; Sugiura S; Hisada T; Washio T
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():712816. PubMed ID: 34483965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolutionary Monte Carlo of QM Properties in Chemical Space: Electrolyte Design.
    Karandashev K; Weinreich J; Heinen S; Arismendi Arrieta DJ; von Rudorff GF; Hermansson K; von Lilienfeld OA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Dec; 19(23):8861-8870. PubMed ID: 38009856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer aided design of a single degree-of-freedom six-bar mechanism via Monte Carlo layered optimization method.
    Zhang Y; Zhang Z
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31033. PubMed ID: 38784564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.