412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27991456)
41. A plan verification platform for online adaptive proton therapy using deep learning-based Monte-Carlo denoising.
Zhang G; Chen X; Dai J; Men K
Phys Med; 2022 Nov; 103():18-25. PubMed ID: 36201903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A dose voxel kernel method for rapid reconstruction of out-of-field neutron dose of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy.
Yeom YS; Griffin K; Mille M; Jung JW; Lee C; Lee C
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(17):175015. PubMed ID: 32726766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of proton pencil beams for computerized treatment plan optimization.
Carlsson AK; Andreo P; Brahme A
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jun; 42(6):1033-53. PubMed ID: 9194127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Application of dose kernel calculation using a simplified Monte Carlo method to treatment plan for scanned proton beams.
Mizutani S; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Tansho R; Akimoto T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):315-327. PubMed ID: 27074456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon interactions for radiotherapy applications.
Franciosini G; Battistoni G; Cerqua A; De Gregorio A; De Maria P; De Simoni M; Dong Y; Fischetti M; Marafini M; Mirabelli R; Muscato A; Patera V; Salvati F; Sarti A; Sciubba A; Toppi M; Traini G; Trigilio A; Schiavi A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36356308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Treatment planning of scanned proton beams in RayStation.
Janson M; Glimelius L; Fredriksson A; Traneus E; Engwall E
Med Dosim; 2024 Spring; 49(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 37996354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A GPU-based fast Monte Carlo code that supports proton transport in magnetic field for radiation therapy.
Li S; Cheng B; Wang Y; Pei X; Xu XG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14208. PubMed ID: 37987549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo.
Yang YM; Svatos M; Zankowski C; Bednarz B
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):3034-3048. PubMed ID: 27277051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media.
Szymanowski H; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3313-30. PubMed ID: 12375823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improving the performance of direct Monte Carlo optimization for large tumor volumes.
Alvarez-Moret J; Dirscherl T; Rickhey M; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20832007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
